Transoral versus Transcervical Drainage of Pharyngeal Abscesses in Children: Post-Operative Complications.

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare complications and other perioperative outcomes between intraoral and transcervical drainage of both retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study that analyzed data from the 2012 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-Pediatric public use files. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes including postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared between intraoral and transcervical drainage groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to inspect predictors of having an extended LOS, defined as LOS greater than 3 days.

RESULTS

A total of 1174 patients were included. Mean age was 5.1 ± 3.8 years in the intraoral group (N = 1063) and 4.2 ± 4.3 years in the transcervical group (N = 111,  < .001). There was no significant difference in the rate of post-operative complications between groups (5.7% intraoral vs 8.1% transcervical,  = .316). LOS was significantly longer in the transcervical group (>3 days in 36.2% of intraoral vs 49.5% of transcervical,  = .006). Patients in the transcervical group had 1.59 times the odds of extended LOS, after adjusting for age, pre-operative ventilator support, asthma, structural pulmonary disease, hematologic disorders, and all post-operative complications ( = .024).

CONCLUSION

There does not appear to be a significant difference in the rate of post-operative complications after intraoral versus transcervical drainage for pharyngeal abscesses in children. However, transcervical drainage was associated with an extended hospital stay. Further prospective studies will be needed to determine the reasons for this.