Department of Plastic Surgery, Wound Repair and Regeneration, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1352. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Hand hygiene using either 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) or natural soap during hand rubbing, followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion in the operating room was compared to assess bacterial reduction, skin moisture, skin texture, and hand hygiene using qualitative questionnaires. A crossover study with 36 professional scrub nurses at two medical centers was performed to compare 4% CHG followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, the Two-stage method with handwashing using natural soap followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion, and the Waterless method, after a period of 10 days of use. The study completely followed CONSORT, www.consort-statement.org. There was no significant difference in bacterial reduction based on the bacterial colony-forming units between the two methods. The skin moisture and skin roughness scores were not significantly different between the two methods. The Waterless method was significantly better than the Two-stage method regarding "foaming," "quality," "longevity" ( < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively), but "disappearance" was significantly better by the Two-stage method ( = 0.0095) during washing and rubbing. Immediately after washing and rubbing, the Waterless method was significantly better regarding "tightness" and "moisture," whereas the Two-stage method was significantly better regarding "stickiness" ( = 0.0114, = <0.0001, and 0.0059, respectively) The Waterless method using natural soap during handwashing followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion was as effective as the Two-stage method of 4% CHG followed by alcohol-based 1% CHG sanitizer lotion. Handwashing using natural soap is simple and superior to hand scrubbing in several aspects.
比较了在手术室中进行手部搓揉时使用 4%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)或天然肥皂,然后使用酒精基 1%CHG 抗菌洗手液,以评估细菌减少、皮肤水分、皮肤质地和手部卫生情况,采用定性问卷进行评估。在两个医疗中心进行了一项有 36 名专业刷手护士参与的交叉研究,以比较 4%CHG 后接酒精基 1%CHG 抗菌洗手液、两步法(先用天然肥皂洗手,再用酒精基 1%CHG 抗菌洗手液)和无水法。使用 10 天后进行研究。本研究完全遵循 CONSORT 标准,www.consort-statement.org。两种方法的细菌减少基于细菌菌落形成单位,无显著差异。两种方法的皮肤水分和皮肤粗糙度评分无显著差异。无水法在“泡沫”、“质量”、“持久性”方面明显优于两步法( <0.0001、 <0.0001 和 <0.0001),但在“消失”方面两步法明显更好( =0.0095)在洗涤和揉搓过程中。洗涤和揉搓后立即,无水法在“紧绷感”和“湿润感”方面明显更好,而两步法在“粘腻感”方面明显更好( =0.0114、 = <0.0001 和 0.0059)。用天然肥皂洗手,然后用酒精基 1%CHG 抗菌洗手液,与两步法(先用 4%CHG,然后用酒精基 1%CHG 抗菌洗手液)同样有效。用天然肥皂洗手比手部刷洗简单,在多个方面更优。