• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策支持系统在慢性疼痛治疗中的转诊效果和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。

Effectiveness and harms of clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01596-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01596-7
PMID:33563328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7874648/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a common public health problem with negative consequences for individuals and societies. Fortunately, interdisciplinary chronic pain management has been shown to be effective for improving patients' outcomes and strongly recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Appropriate referral within the healthcare system based on individuals' needs and available services is essential to optimise health-related outcomes and maximise resources. Clinical decision support systems have been shown to be effective for supporting healthcare professionals in different practices. However, there is no knowledge synthesis on clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice. We aim to identify the clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practices and assess their content, effectiveness, harms, and validation parameters.

METHODS

Using the methodology of Cochrane reviews, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis based on studies meeting the following criteria: Population, patients with chronic pain and/or healthcare professionals working in chronic pain; Intervention, clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice; Comparison, any other clinical tool, any usual care or practices; Outcomes, clinical outcomes of patients measuring how patients feel, function or survive including benefits, adverse effects, continuity of care, care appropriateness, care satisfaction, quality of life, healthcare professional performance, and cost outcomes; and Study design: randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after controlled studies and interrupted time series. We will search relevant literature with the support of an information specialist using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, CINHAL, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from their inception onwards. Two reviewers will independently complete study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We will analyse data to perform both narrative syntheses and meta-analysis if appropriate.

DISCUSSION

Findings of this review will contribute to enhancing chronic pain care and research. Clinical decision support systems identified as effective in this review can be investigated for implementation in clinical practice and impact on improving patient, clinical and health system outcomes. Clinical decision support systems not yet ready for implementation that require further improvement will also be identified.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42020158880 .

摘要

背景

慢性疼痛是一个常见的公共卫生问题,会给个人和社会带来负面影响。幸运的是,跨学科慢性疼痛管理已被证明能有效改善患者的预后,并在临床实践指南中得到强烈推荐。根据个人的需求和可用服务,在医疗保健系统内进行适当的转介对于优化健康相关结果和最大限度地利用资源至关重要。临床决策支持系统已被证明可有效支持不同实践中的医疗保健专业人员。然而,目前尚无关于慢性疼痛实践中转介的临床决策支持系统的知识综合。我们的目标是确定慢性疼痛实践中转介的临床决策支持系统,并评估其内容、有效性、危害和验证参数。

方法

使用 Cochrane 综述的方法,我们将基于符合以下标准的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析:人群,患有慢性疼痛的患者和/或在慢性疼痛中工作的医疗保健专业人员;干预措施,慢性疼痛实践中的临床决策支持系统转介;比较,任何其他临床工具,任何常规护理或实践;结局,衡量患者感受、功能或生存的患者临床结局,包括获益、不良反应、护理连续性、护理适宜性、护理满意度、生活质量、医疗保健专业人员绩效和成本结果;以及研究设计:随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、前后对照研究和中断时间序列研究。我们将在信息专家的支持下,使用 Medline、Embase、PsycInfo、CINHAL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 从其成立开始搜索相关文献。两名审查员将独立完成研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。我们将分析数据以进行叙述性综合和荟萃分析(如果合适)。

讨论

本综述的结果将有助于加强慢性疼痛护理和研究。本综述中确定为有效的临床决策支持系统可用于调查其在临床实践中的实施情况及其对改善患者、临床和卫生系统结果的影响。还将确定那些尚未准备好实施但需要进一步改进的临床决策支持系统。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 注册:CRD42020158880。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and harms of clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床决策支持系统在慢性疼痛治疗中的转诊效果和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01596-7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Improving the usefulness of evidence concerning the effectiveness of implementation strategies for knowledge products in primary healthcare: protocol for a series of systematic reviews.提高有关初级医疗保健中知识产品实施策略有效性的证据的有用性:一系列系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 19;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01382-x.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
8
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.

本文引用的文献

1
The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.修订后的国际疼痛研究协会疼痛定义:概念、挑战和妥协。
Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
2
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
3
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
4
Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies.慢性疼痛:基于人群的研究中其流行病学及相关因素的综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e273-e283. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家发病率、患病率以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2016 年 328 种疾病和伤害导致的残疾年数:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
6
Assessing the relationship between chronic pain and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估慢性疼痛与心血管疾病之间的关系:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:76-90. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Clinical Decision Support to Efficiently Identify Patients Eligible for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.临床决策支持以有效识别适合心力衰竭先进疗法的患者。
J Card Fail. 2017 Oct;23(10):719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.08.449. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在流行病学研究中定义慢性疼痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain. 2017 Nov;158(11):2092-2107. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001009.
9
Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动机性访谈干预对慢性病成人药物依从性的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):589-602. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw273.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.