Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):925-934. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2871. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
To estimate trends in total payment and patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) payments of noninsulin glucose-lowering drugs by class from 2005 to 2018.
We analyzed data for 53 million prescriptions from adults aged >18 years with type 2 diabetes under fee-for-service plans from the 2005-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Databases. The total payment was measured as the amount that the pharmacy received, and the OOP payment was the sum of copay, coinsurance, and deductible paid by the beneficiaries. We applied a joinpoint regression to evaluate nonlinear trends in cost between 2005 and 2018. We further conducted a decomposition analysis to explore the drivers for total payment change.
Total annual payments for older drug classes, including metformin, sulfonylurea, meglitinide, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and thiazolidinedione, declined during 2005-2018, ranging from -$271 (-53.8%) for metformin to -$2,406 (-92.2%) for thiazolidinedione. OOP payments for these drug classes also reduced. In the same period, the total annual payments for the newer drug classes, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, increased by $2,181 (88.4%), $3,721 (77.6%), and $1,374 (37.0%), respectively. OOP payment for these newer classes remained relatively unchanged. Our study findings indicate that switching toward the newer classes for noninsulin glucose-lowering drugs was the main driver that explained the total payment increase.
Average annual payments and OOP payment for noninsulin glucose-lowering drugs increased significantly from 2005 to 2018. The uptake of newer drug classes was the main driver.
估计 2005 年至 2018 年非胰岛素类降血糖药物按类别计算的总支付额和患者自付额(OOP)的趋势。
我们分析了来自 2005 年至 2018 年 IBM MarketScan 商业数据库中 5300 万份 18 岁以上 2 型糖尿病患者的服务计划费用的处方数据。总支付额是药房收到的金额,OOP 支付额是患者自付的共付额、保险额和免赔额的总和。我们应用连接点回归评估 2005 年至 2018 年期间成本的非线性趋势。我们进一步进行了分解分析,以探讨总支付额变化的驱动因素。
较老药物类别的年总支付额,包括二甲双胍、磺酰脲类、格列奈类、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和噻唑烷二酮类,在 2005 年至 2018 年期间下降,从二甲双胍的-271 美元(-53.8%)到噻唑烷二酮类的-2406 美元(-92.2%)。这些药物类别的 OOP 支付额也有所减少。同期,新型药物类别的年总支付额,包括二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂,分别增加了 2181 美元(88.4%)、3721 美元(77.6%)和 1374 美元(37.0%)。这些新型药物类别的 OOP 支付额相对保持不变。我们的研究结果表明,非胰岛素类降血糖药物向新型药物类别的转换是解释总支付额增加的主要原因。
2005 年至 2018 年,非胰岛素类降血糖药物的年平均支付额和 OOP 支付额显著增加。新型药物类别的采用是主要驱动因素。