Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Feb;25(2):516-525. doi: 10.1111/dom.14894. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
To examine changes in racial and ethnic disparities in glucose-lowering drugs (GLD) use and glycated haemoglobin A1c in US adults with diabetes from 2005 to 2018.
We conducted pooled cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2005-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, and the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Individuals ≥18 years with diabetes were included. Racial and ethnic disparities were measured in (a) newer non-insulin GLD use; (b) insulin analogue use; (c) non-insulin GLDs adherence; (d) insulin adherence; and (e) glucose management, along with (f) the proportion of the disparities explained by potential contributing factors.
From 2005 to 2018, racial and ethnic disparities persisted in newer GLD use, non-insulin GLDs adherence, insulin analogue use and glucose management. In 2018, compared with non-Hispanic white adults, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups had lower rates of using newer GLDs (adjusted risk ratio: 0.44, 0.52, 0.64, respectively; p < .05 for all) and insulin analogues (adjusted risk ratio: 0.93, 0.89, 0.95, respectively; p < .05 for all except other groups), lower non-insulin GLD adherence (proportion of days covered: -4.5%, -5.6%, -4.3%, respectively; p < .05 for all), higher glycated haemoglobin A1c (0.29%, 0.32%, 0.02%, respectively; p < .05 for all except other group), and similar insulin adherences. Socioeconomic and health status were the main contributors to these disparities.
Our findings provide evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in newer GLD use and quality of care in glucose management. Our study results can inform decision-makers of the status of racial and ethnic disparities and identify ways to reduce these disparities.
从 2005 年至 2018 年,考察美国糖尿病患者中降血糖药物(GLD)使用和糖化血红蛋白 A1c 的种族和民族差异变化。
我们使用 2005-2018 年医疗支出调查和 2005-2018 年国家健康和营养调查的数据进行了汇总横断面分析。纳入年龄≥18 岁且患有糖尿病的个体。测量了种族和民族差异在以下方面的表现:(a) 使用新型非胰岛素 GLD;(b) 使用胰岛素类似物;(c) 非胰岛素 GLD 依从性;(d) 胰岛素依从性;以及(e) 葡萄糖管理,以及(f) 潜在促成因素解释的差异比例。
从 2005 年至 2018 年,新型 GLD 使用、非胰岛素 GLD 依从性、胰岛素类似物使用和葡萄糖管理方面仍然存在种族和民族差异。2018 年,与非西班牙裔白人成年人相比,非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔和其他种族/族裔群体使用新型 GLD 的比例较低(调整风险比:0.44、0.52、0.64,分别;所有 p 值<.05)和胰岛素类似物(调整风险比:0.93、0.89、0.95,分别;除其他群体外所有 p 值<.05),非胰岛素 GLD 依从性较低(覆盖天数比例:-4.5%、-5.6%、-4.3%,分别;所有 p 值<.05),糖化血红蛋白 A1c 较高(0.29%、0.32%、0.02%,分别;除其他群体外所有 p 值<.05),胰岛素依从性相似。社会经济和健康状况是造成这些差异的主要原因。
我们的研究结果为新型 GLD 使用和葡萄糖管理方面的种族和民族差异以及护理质量提供了证据。我们的研究结果可以为决策者提供种族和民族差异的现状,并确定减少这些差异的方法。