Mondal Shinjini, Van Belle Sara, Maioni Antonia
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges Rd, Montreal, Quebec H3S 1Z1, Canada.
Department of Public Health, Health Policy Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 May 17;36(4):552-571. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa163.
Intersectoral action (ISA) is considered pivotal for achieving health and societal goals but remains difficult to achieve as it requires complex efforts, resources and coordinated responses from multiple sectors and organizations. While ISA in health is often desired, its potential can be better informed by the advanced theory-building and empirical application in real-world contexts from political science, public administration and environmental sciences. Considering the importance and the associated challenges in achieving ISA, we have conducted a meta-narrative review, in the research domains of political science, public administration, environmental and health. The review aims to identify theory, theoretical concepts and empirical applications of ISA in these identified research traditions and draw learning for health. Using the multidisciplinary database of SCOPUS from 1996 to 2017, 5535 records were identified, 155 full-text articles were reviewed and 57 papers met our final inclusion criteria. In our findings, we trace the theoretical roots of ISA across all research domains, describing the main focus and motivation to pursue collaborative work. The literature synthesis is organized around the following: implementation instruments, formal mechanisms and informal networks, enabling institutional environments involving the interplay of hardware (i.e. resources, management systems, structures) and software (more specifically the realms of ideas, values, power); and the important role of leaders who can work across boundaries in promoting ISA, political mobilization and the essential role of hybrid accountability mechanisms. Overall, our review reaffirms affirms that ISA has both technical and political dimensions. In addition to technical concerns for strengthening capacities and providing support instruments and mechanisms, future research must carefully consider power and inter-organizational dynamics in order to develop a more fulsome understanding and improve the implementation of intersectoral initiatives, as well as to ensure their sustainability. This also shows the need for continued attention to emergent knowledge bases across different research domains including health.
部门间行动(ISA)被认为是实现健康和社会目标的关键,但由于它需要多个部门和组织进行复杂的努力、投入资源并做出协调一致的反应,因此仍然难以实现。虽然人们通常期望在卫生领域开展部门间行动,但其潜力可以通过政治学、公共行政学和环境科学在现实世界背景下的先进理论构建和实证应用得到更好的认识。考虑到实现部门间行动的重要性及其相关挑战,我们在政治学、公共行政学、环境科学和卫生研究领域进行了一项元叙事综述。该综述旨在确定部门间行动在这些已确定的研究传统中的理论、理论概念和实证应用,并为卫生领域提供借鉴。利用1996年至2017年的多学科数据库SCOPUS,共识别出5535条记录,对155篇全文文章进行了审查,57篇论文符合我们的最终纳入标准。在我们的研究结果中,我们追溯了部门间行动在所有研究领域的理论根源,描述了开展合作工作的主要重点和动机。文献综述围绕以下内容展开:实施工具、正式机制和非正式网络,促成涉及硬件(即资源、管理系统、结构)和软件(更具体地说是思想、价值观、权力领域)相互作用的制度环境;以及能够跨界开展工作的领导者在促进部门间行动、政治动员方面的重要作用以及混合问责机制的关键作用。总体而言,我们的综述重申,部门间行动具有技术和政治两个层面。除了加强能力以及提供支持工具和机制等技术问题外,未来的研究必须仔细考虑权力和组织间动态,以便更全面地理解并改进部门间举措的实施,同时确保其可持续性。这也表明需要持续关注包括卫生领域在内的不同研究领域中不断涌现的知识库。