Health Equity and Policy Directorate, Strategic Policy Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Social Determinants of Health Division, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Equity, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2024 Oct;44(10):440-449. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.9.04.
Many of the social and economic factors that shape conditions for population health and health equity (e.g. income, education and employment) lie outside of the health sector. Intersectoral action (ISA) is pivotal to building diverse partnerships that address these social determinants of health. Despite the significant role of ISA, there are few comprehensive reports from the health sector on how such partnerships are evaluated. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of examples of ISA partnership evaluations, including the identification of evaluation methods, tools and indicators.
A literature search of two academic databases, Embase and MEDLINE, identified seven relevant studies published between 2012 and 2022.
Common evaluation approaches were network analysis, community- or system- level analysis, partnership evaluation and longitudinal process evaluation. Five of the studies assessed the strength and functionality of partnerships, with reach (e.g. distance between partners) used most frequently as an indicator.
Despite the complexity of evaluating ISA partnerships, such evaluations are crucial for assessing impacts on health outcomes and social determinants of health, goal achievement, accountability and sustainability. Different evaluation models are available to program planners and evaluators involved in ISA initiatives.
影响人口健康和健康公平的许多社会和经济因素(如收入、教育和就业)都在卫生部门之外。部门间行动(ISA)对于建立多样化的伙伴关系以解决这些健康决定因素至关重要。尽管 ISA 具有重要作用,但卫生部门很少有关于此类伙伴关系如何进行评估的全面报告。本范围综述的目的是概述 ISA 伙伴关系评估的示例,包括评估方法、工具和指标的确定。
对 Embase 和 MEDLINE 这两个学术数据库进行文献检索,确定了 2012 年至 2022 年期间发表的七项相关研究。
常见的评估方法包括网络分析、社区或系统层面分析、伙伴关系评估和纵向过程评估。五项研究评估了伙伴关系的强度和功能,最常使用的指标是覆盖面(例如,合作伙伴之间的距离)。
尽管评估 ISA 伙伴关系很复杂,但这些评估对于评估对健康结果和健康决定因素的影响、目标实现、问责制和可持续性至关重要。参与 ISA 计划的方案规划者和评估人员可以使用不同的评估模型。