Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆囊切除术时降低腹腔镜内压及其对术后疼痛的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Northern Health, 185 Cooper St, Epping, VIC, Australia.

Department of Anaesthetics, Northern Health, Epping, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):2806-2813. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04919-0. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is regarded as the gold standard for the surgical management of cholelithiasis. To improve post-operative pain, low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LPLC) have been trialed. A recent systematic review found that LPLC reduced pain; however, many of the randomised control trials were at a high risk of bias and the overall quality of evidence was low.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to a LPLC (8 mmHg) or a standard pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (12 mmHg) (SPLC) with surgeons and anaesthetists blinded to the pressure. Pressures were increased if vision was compromised. Primary outcomes were post-operative pain and analgesia requirements at 4-6 h and 24 h.

RESULTS

Intra-operative visibility was significantly reduced in LPLC (p<0.01) resulting in a higher number of operations requiring the pressure to be increased (29% vs 8%, p=0.010); however, there were no differences in length of operation or post-operative outcomes. Pain scores were comparable at all time points across all pressures; however, recovery room fentanyl requirement was more than four times higher when comparing 8 to 12 mmHg (12.5mcg vs 60mcg, p=0.047). Nausea and vomiting was also higher when comparing these pressures (0/36 vs 7/60, p=0.033). Interestingly, when surgeons estimated the operating pressure, they were correct in only 69% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Although pain scores were similar, there was a significant reduction in fentanyl requirement and nausea/vomiting in LPLC. Although LPLC compromised intra-operative visibility requiring increased pressure in some cases, there was no difference in complications, suggesting LPLC is safe and beneficial to attempt in all patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000205134).

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术被认为是治疗胆石症的金标准手术方法。为了改善术后疼痛,已经尝试了低压腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LPLC)。最近的系统评价发现,LPLC 可减轻疼痛;然而,许多随机对照试验存在高偏倚风险,总体证据质量较低。

方法

将 100 名接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者随机分为 LPLC(8mmHg)或标准压力腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SPLC)(12mmHg)组,术者和麻醉师对压力均不知情。如果视野受到影响,则增加压力。主要结局是术后 4-6 小时和 24 小时的术后疼痛和镇痛需求。

结果

LPLC 术中可见度明显降低(p<0.01),导致需要增加压力的手术数量增加(29%比 8%,p=0.010);然而,手术时间和术后结果无差异。所有压力下的疼痛评分在所有时间点均相似;然而,当比较 8mmHg 和 12mmHg 时,恢复室芬太尼需求高出四倍以上(12.5mcg 比 60mcg,p=0.047)。比较这些压力时,恶心和呕吐也更高(0/36 比 7/60,p=0.033)。有趣的是,当术者估计手术压力时,他们只有 69%的情况是正确的。

结论

尽管疼痛评分相似,但 LPLC 可显著降低芬太尼需求和恶心/呕吐。尽管 LPLC 术中可见度降低,在某些情况下需要增加压力,但并发症无差异,表明 LPLC 安全且有益,应尝试用于所有患者。

试验注册

在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12619000205134)注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验