Suppr超能文献

混合型肝细胞癌:基于肝细胞癌危险因素的磁共振成像特征和预后。

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Prognosis According to Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun;53(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27528. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) can develop in patients with and without risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of cHCC-CCA in patients with and without risk factors for HCC, and to assess the influence of risk factors on patient prognosis.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 152 patients with surgically confirmed cHCC-CCA.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5-T and 3-T/T1-weighted dual gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo, diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar, and T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo contrast-enhanced sequences.

ASSESSMENT

MRI features according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and pathologic findings based on revised classification were compared between patients with and without risk factors for HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were also compared between the two groups, and factors associated with survival were evaluated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The clinico-pathologic and MRI features of the two groups were compared using Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and chi-square tests. OS and RFS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

cHCC-CCA in patients with risk factors were more frequently classified as LI-RADS category 4 or 5 (LR-4/5; probably or definitely HCC) (48.7%), whereas those without risk factors were more frequently classified as category M (LR-M; probably malignant, not specific for HCC) (63.6%). RFS and OS did not differ significantly according to risk factors (P = 0.63 and 0.83). Multivariable analysis showed that pathologic tumor type (hazard ratio 2.02; P < 0.05) and LI-RADS category (hazard ratio 2.19; P < 0.05) were significantly associated with RFS and OS, respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

Although MRI features of cHCC-CCA differed significantly between patients with and without risk factors for HCC, postsurgical prognosis did not. LI-RADS category and pathologic tumor type were independently correlated with postsurgical prognosis in patients with cHCC-CCA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

摘要

背景

合并肝细胞癌-胆管细胞癌(cHCC-CCA)可发生于有或无肝细胞癌(HCC)风险因素的患者中。

目的

比较有和无 HCC 风险因素的 cHCC-CCA 患者的临床和磁共振成像(MRI)特征,并评估风险因素对患者预后的影响。

研究类型

回顾性。

人群

共纳入 152 例经手术证实的 cHCC-CCA 患者。

磁场强度/序列:1.5T 和 3T/T1 加权双梯度回波同相位和反相位、T2 加权涡轮自旋回波、扩散加权单次激发自旋回波平面回波、T1 加权三维梯度回波对比增强序列。

评估

根据肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)和基于修订分类的病理发现比较有和无 HCC 风险因素患者的 MRI 特征。还比较了两组患者的总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS),并评估了与生存相关的因素。

统计学检验

使用 Student's t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和卡方检验比较两组的临床病理和 MRI 特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估 OS 和 RFS,并采用 Cox 比例风险模型评估与生存相关的因素。

结果

有风险因素的 cHCC-CCA 患者更常被归类为 LI-RADS 类别 4 或 5(LR-4/5;可能或肯定为 HCC)(48.7%),而无风险因素的患者更常被归类为类别 M(LR-M;可能恶性,非 HCC 特异性)(63.6%)。RFS 和 OS 与风险因素无关(P=0.63 和 0.83)。多变量分析显示,病理肿瘤类型(风险比 2.02;P<0.05)和 LI-RADS 类别(风险比 2.19;P<0.05)与 RFS 和 OS 显著相关。

数据结论

尽管有和无 HCC 风险因素的 cHCC-CCA 患者的 MRI 特征存在显著差异,但术后预后并无差异。LI-RADS 类别和病理肿瘤类型与 cHCC-CCA 患者的术后预后独立相关。

证据水平

3 级技术功效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验