Department of Nephrology, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2020 Nov-Dec;31(6):1320-1330. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.308341.
In this study, we aimed to measure glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) using Tc DTPA in patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis and normal serum creatinine levels; and to compare the performance of creatinine and cystatin C-based equations [estimated GFRs (eGFRs)] to TcDTPA GFR in the same group. We selected a group of 65 consecutive patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and apparently normal renal function by serum creatinine alone. Patients with confounding and reversible factors were excluded. Demographic data, blood, urine, and imaging tests along with simultaneous measurement of serum creatinine and cystatin C were analyzed. The GFR was measured by Tc DTPAscintigraphy (mGFR) in 41 patients. We compared the performance of chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI-creatinine, CKD-EPI-cystatinC, CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation equations for bias (mean difference), precision (root mean square error), and accuracy (P10 and P30). Bland-Altman plots were used to show the agreement of eGFR and mGFR. Twenty-five out of 41 patients (61%) had significant renal dysfunction (GFR ≤60 mL/min/ 1.73m) by TcDTPA in our study and three patients were already in Stage 4 CKD. Unlike serum creatinine, serum cystatin C values were deranged in these patients. Among all GFR estimating formulae, CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC combined equation had the least bias (-2.3), superior precision (7.1), highest P30 accuracy (78%), good sensitivity (87.5%), and best specificity (96%) in our study. Two-thirds of patients with cirrhosis had significant renal impairment despite having normal serum creatinine. Isolated serum creatinine values are misleading in cirrhosis. Cystatin C unmasks renal dysfunction in these patients. CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC equation showed the best correlation and accuracy with TcDTPA GFR in our study. Creatinine based GFR estimation is fallacious in cirrhosis. Cystatin C and equations based on it may be worthwhile in liver disease.
在这项研究中,我们旨在测量肾小球滤过率(mGFR)使用 Tc DTPA 在患有 Child-Pugh C 肝硬化和正常血清肌酐水平的患者;并比较基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的方程[估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)]与 TcDTPA 在同一组中的 GFR。我们选择了一组 65 例连续的晚期肝硬化患者,仅通过血清肌酐即可检测到明显正常的肾功能。排除了混杂和可逆因素的患者。分析了人口统计学数据、血液、尿液和影像学检查以及同时测量血清肌酐和胱抑素 C。 41 例患者通过 Tc DTPA 闪烁扫描法(mGFR)测量 GFR。我们比较了慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI-creatinine、CKD-EPI-cystatinC、CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC)和改良饮食肾病方程的性能,用于偏倚(平均差异)、精度(均方根误差)和准确性(P10 和 P30)。Bland-Altman 图用于显示 eGFR 和 mGFR 的一致性。在我们的研究中,41 例患者中有 25 例(61%)通过 TcDTPA 显示出明显的肾功能障碍(GFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73m),其中 3 例患者已经处于 4 期 CKD。与血清肌酐不同,这些患者的血清胱抑素 C 值异常。在所有 GFR 估计公式中,在我们的研究中,CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC 联合方程具有最小的偏差(-2.3)、更高的精度(7.1)、最高的 P30 准确性(78%)、良好的敏感性(87.5%)和最佳特异性(96%)。尽管血清肌酐正常,但三分之二的肝硬化患者仍存在严重的肾功能损害。单独的血清肌酐值在肝硬化中具有误导性。胱抑素 C 揭示了这些患者的肾功能障碍。在我们的研究中,CKD-EPI-creatinine-cystatinC 方程与 TcDTPA GFR 具有最佳的相关性和准确性。基于肌酐的 GFR 估计在肝硬化中是错误的。胱抑素 C 及其基于它的方程在肝病中可能是有价值的。