From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, the Department of Surgery, and the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health; the Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):213e-221e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007589.
There remain significant gaps in the evidence-based care of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy with regard to implications for breast cancer development and screening. The current clinical evidence does not demonstrate an increased risk of breast cancer secondary to testosterone therapy in transgender patients. Gender-affirmation mastectomy techniques vary significantly with regard to the amount of residual breast tissue left behind, which has unknown implications for the incidence of postoperative breast cancer and need for screening. Subcutaneous mastectomy should aim to remove all gross breast parenchyma, although this is limited in certain techniques. Tissue specimens should also be routinely sent for pathologic analysis. Several cases of incidental breast cancer after subcutaneous mastectomy have been described. There is little evidence on the need for or types of postoperative cancer screening. Chest awareness is an important concept for patients that have undergone subcutaneous mastectomies, as clinical examination remains the most common reported method of postmastectomy malignancy detection. In patients with greater known retained breast tissue, such as those with circumareolar or pedicled techniques, consideration may be given to alternative imaging modalities, although the efficacy and cost-utility of these techniques must still be proven. Preoperative patient counseling on the risk of breast cancer after gender-affirming mastectomy in addition to the unknown implications of residual breast tissue and long-term androgen exposure is critical. Patient awareness and education play an important role in shared decision-making, as further research is needed to define standards of medical and oncologic care in this population.
在接受性别肯定乳房切除术的患者的循证护理方面,仍然存在着显著的差距,特别是在乳腺癌发展和筛查的影响方面。目前的临床证据并未表明,接受性别肯定治疗的跨性别患者因睾丸激素治疗而导致乳腺癌风险增加。性别肯定乳房切除术技术在残留乳房组织量方面存在显著差异,这对术后乳腺癌的发生率和筛查需求具有未知的影响。皮下乳房切除术的目标应是切除所有明显的乳房实质组织,尽管在某些技术中受到限制。还应常规将组织标本送检进行病理分析。已经描述了几例皮下乳房切除术后偶然发现的乳腺癌病例。关于术后癌症筛查的必要性或类型,证据很少。胸部意识对于接受皮下乳房切除术的患者来说是一个重要的概念,因为临床检查仍然是最常见的报道的乳房切除术后恶性肿瘤检测方法。对于那些保留较多已知乳房组织的患者,例如乳晕周围或带蒂技术的患者,可以考虑使用替代成像方式,尽管这些技术的有效性和成本效益仍需证明。除了残留乳房组织和长期雄激素暴露的未知影响外,对接受性别肯定乳房切除术的患者进行乳腺癌风险的术前患者咨询至关重要。患者意识和教育在共同决策中起着重要作用,因为需要进一步研究来确定该人群的医学和肿瘤学护理标准。