Suppr超能文献

长期氧疗患者使用便携氧气的负担和未满足的需求。

Burden and Unmet Needs with Portable Oxygen in Patients on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy.

机构信息

Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Sep;18(9):1498-1505. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-487OC.

Abstract

Over 1.5 million Americans receive long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) for the treatment of chronic hypoxemia to optimize functional status and quality of life. However, current portable oxygen equipment, including portable gas tanks (GTs), portable liquid tanks (LTs), and portable oxygen concentrators (POCs), each have limitations that can hinder patient mobility and daily activities. To examine patient experiences with portable oxygen to guide equipment innovation and thereby improve patient care on oxygen therapy. The burden and unmet needs with portable oxygen equipment were assessed in 836 LTOT patients with chronic lung disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension) through an online survey. The survey included a combination of multiple-choice, Likert-scale, short-answer, and open-ended questions. Distribution was achieved through patient support organizations, including the U.S. COPD Coalition, the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Improvements in portability were ranked as the highest priority by patients across all equipment types, followed by increases in the duration of oxygen supply for GTs, accessibility for LTs, and flow capabilities for POCs. All device types were found to be burdensome, with the greatest burden among GT users, 51% of whom characterized GT use as "strenuous" or "extremely strenuous" (high burden). POCs ranked as the most common (61%) and least burdensome devices; however, 29% of POC users still reported a high associated burden. Forty-seven percent of POC respondents described using a POC despite it not meeting their oxygen needs to benefit from advantages over alternative equipment. Among non-POC users, limited oxygen flow rate capabilities and cost were the top reasons preventing POC use. Although improvements have been made to portable oxygen equipment, this study highlights the burden that remains and reveals a clear need for advances in technology to improve the functional status and quality of life of portable LTOT users.

摘要

超过 150 万美国人接受长期氧疗 (LTOT) 以治疗慢性低氧血症,从而优化功能状态和生活质量。然而,目前的便携式氧气设备,包括便携式气罐 (GT)、便携式液罐 (LT) 和便携式氧气浓缩器 (POC),各自都存在限制,可能会阻碍患者的活动能力和日常活动。为了了解患者对便携式氧气的体验,以指导设备创新,从而改善氧疗患者的护理。通过一项在线调查,评估了 836 名患有慢性肺部疾病(慢性阻塞性肺疾病 [COPD]、间质性肺疾病和肺动脉高压)的 LTOT 患者对便携式氧气设备的负担和未满足的需求。该调查包括多项选择题、李克特量表、简答题和开放式问题。通过患者支持组织(包括美国 COPD 联盟、肺纤维化基金会和肺动脉高压协会)进行了调查的分发。所有设备类型的患者都将便携性的改善列为最高优先级,其次是 GT 氧气供应持续时间的增加、LT 的易访问性以及 POC 的流量能力。所有设备类型都被认为是负担沉重的,GT 用户的负担最大,其中 51%的人认为 GT 使用“费力”或“极其费力”(高负担)。POC 被评为最常见(61%)和负担最小的设备;然而,仍有 29%的 POC 用户报告存在较高的相关负担。47%的 POC 受访者描述了尽管 POC 不能满足他们的氧气需求,但仍在使用它,以受益于替代设备的优势。在非 POC 用户中,限制氧气流量能力和成本是阻止 POC 使用的主要原因。尽管便携式氧气设备已经得到改进,但这项研究强调了仍然存在的负担,并清楚地表明需要在技术上取得进展,以改善便携式 LTOT 用户的功能状态和生活质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验