口腔卫生工作流程：巴西各团队之间的差异，2014 年。
Oral health work process: disparity between teams in Brazil, 2014.
机构信息
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Odontologia Social e Preventiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Clínica, Patologia e Cirurgia Odontológicas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
出版信息
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Feb 5;30(1):e2019533. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742021000100013. eCollection 2021.
OBJECTIVE
To compare Modality I and Modality II Oral Health Teams (OHT) regarding work process performance and differences between Brazilian regions.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study with OHTs that took part in the National Program for Primary Health Care Access and Quality Improvement (2013-2014). Latent Class Analysis identified OHT subgroups according to work process (action planning, health promotion actions and comprehensive health care) performance (consolidated, developing or incipient). OHT modalities were compared, resulting in an Index of Disparity.
RESULTS
After evaluating 15,886 OHTs, Modality II OHTs were found to have a higher percentage of consolidated work processes in the Southeast (67.8%-94.6%) and Southern (54.8%-93.0%) regions. Disparity in the consolidated work process was greater among Modality II OHTs (6.3-26.5) compared to Modality I OHTs (3.9-18.4).
CONCLUSION
Modality II OHTs have the potential for better performance regarding the work process, but with regional disparities.
目的
比较模式 I 和模式 II 口腔健康团队（OHT）在工作流程绩效方面的差异，以及巴西各地区之间的差异。
方法
这是一项横断面研究，参与国家初级卫生保健获得和质量改进计划（2013-2014 年）的 OHT 参与了该研究。潜在类别分析根据工作流程（行动计划、健康促进行动和综合保健）绩效（综合、发展或初始）对 OHT 亚组进行了分类。对 OHT 模式进行了比较，从而产生了差异指数。
结果
在评估了 15886 个 OHT 后，发现模式 II OHT 在东南部（67.8%-94.6%）和南部（54.8%-93.0%）地区的综合工作流程比例更高。与模式 I OHT（3.9-18.4）相比，模式 II OHT 的综合工作流程差异更大（6.3-26.5）。
结论
模式 II OHT 在工作流程方面具有更好的表现潜力，但存在地区差异。
Zotero 插件