Suppr超能文献

4D 流 MRI:感兴趣区大小、角度和空间分辨率对主动脉血流评估的影响。

4D flow MRI: impact of region of interest size, angulation and spatial resolution on aortic flow assessment.

机构信息

Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería (IMeTTyB), Universidad Favaloro-CONICET, Solís 453, CP 1078 Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, INSERM U970, Paris, France.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2021 Apr 6;42(3). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/abe525.

Abstract

In cardiovascular magnetic resonance, the 3D time-resolved phase-contrast technique, also known as 4D flow, is gaining increasing attention due to applications that exploit three-directional velocity encoding throughout the cardiac cycle. Blood flow volume assessment usually requires an expert to draw regions of interest (ROI) around the vessel cross section, whereas the errors involved in this estimation have not been thoroughly investigated. Our objective is to quantify the influence of ROI sizing, angulation and spatial resolution of the reconstructed plane employed in blood flow measurements using 4D flow.Three circular ROIs were drawn around the ascending, arch and descending aorta of healthy volunteers (= 27) and patients with a dilated ascending aorta or bicuspid valve (= 37). We applied systematic changes of ROI diameter (up to ±10%), tilt angle (up to ±25°) and spatial resolution (from 0.25 to 2 mm) of the reconstructed oblique planes, calculating the effects on net, forward and backward blood flow volumes.Patients had a larger ascending aorta than healthy volunteers with similar ages and male sex proportion (60 ± 15 y.o. vs 58 ± 16 y.o. and 84% vs 70%, respectively). Higher forward and backward flow volumes were observed in the ascending aorta and the aortic arch of the patients with respect to controls (< 0.001), whereas net volumes were similar: 74.0 ± 20.8 ml versus 75.7 ± 21.8 ml (= 0.37), respectively. The ascending aorta was the most sensitive to ROI modifications. Changes of ±10% in the ROI diameter and ±25° in tilt angles produced flow volume differences of up to 9 ml (10%) and 18 ml (15%) in controls and patients, respectively. Modifying the reconstructed planes spatial resolution produced flow volume changes below 2 ml.Since the setting of the ROI size and plane angle could produce errors that represent up to 20% of the forward and/or backward aortic flow volume, a good standardization for vessel segmentation and plane positioning is desirable.

摘要

在心血管磁共振中,三维时间分辨相位对比技术,也称为 4D 流,由于在整个心动周期中利用三维速度编码的应用而受到越来越多的关注。血流容积评估通常需要专家在血管横截面上绘制感兴趣区域(ROI),而这种估计所涉及的误差尚未得到彻底研究。我们的目标是量化使用 4D 流进行血流测量时 ROI 大小、角度和重建平面空间分辨率对血流测量的影响。

我们在 27 名健康志愿者和 37 名升主动脉扩张或二叶式主动脉瓣患者的升主动脉、弓部和降主动脉周围绘制了三个圆形 ROI。我们系统地改变了重建斜平面的 ROI 直径(最大±10%)、倾斜角度(最大±25°)和空间分辨率(从 0.25 到 2 毫米),计算了这些变化对净、前向和后向血流容积的影响。

与具有相似年龄和男性比例(分别为 84%和 70%)的健康志愿者相比,患者的升主动脉更大。与对照组相比,患者的升主动脉和主动脉弓的前向和后向血流容积更高(<0.001),而净血流容积相似:分别为 74.0±20.8ml 和 75.7±21.8ml(=0.37)。ROI 的变化对升主动脉最敏感。在对照组和患者中,ROI 直径变化±10%和倾斜角度变化±25°可导致血流容积差异高达 9ml(10%)和 18ml(15%)。改变重建平面的空间分辨率可导致血流容积变化小于 2ml。

由于 ROI 大小和平面角度的设置可能会产生高达前向和/或后向主动脉血流容积的 20%的误差,因此需要对血管分割和平面定位进行良好的标准化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验