Saffle J R, Jordan M H, Hammond J, Heggers J
Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988 Jan-Feb;9(1):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00004630-198801000-00025.
The Committee on Organization and Delivery of Burn Care of the American Burn Association conducted a survey among burn care facilities to determine the extent of interest in development and maintenance of computerized patient registries. Initial questionnaires were mailed to 178 burn care facilities. Responses were obtained from 112 (62.9%). Eighty-seven (77%) of the responders indicated that they have some form of registry. Thirty-five of these registries were in the form of handwritten logbooks, while 43 were personal computers with a wide variety of hardware and software. Uses of these registries include patient census and reports (64% of responders), clinical research (62%), patient care (61%), and, less common, quality assurance and education. Twenty-five facilities stated that they do not maintain a registry, but 22 (88%) of them indicated interest in developing one. It seems unlikely that a single system could be designed to fill the needs of all facilities, nor is it likely that existing registries can be "networked" successfully. This is due not only to the diversity of data in the existing registries, but also to the important differences in the way basic terminology is used in different facilities. For burn care facilities interested in developing their own registry, a selected list of successful representative registries is provided.
美国烧伤协会烧伤护理组织与提供委员会对烧伤护理机构进行了一项调查,以确定对开发和维护计算机化患者登记系统的兴趣程度。初步问卷被邮寄给178家烧伤护理机构。112家(62.9%)机构做出了回应。87家(77%)回应者表示他们有某种形式的登记系统。其中35个登记系统是手写日志形式,43个是配有各种硬件和软件的个人电脑。这些登记系统的用途包括患者普查和报告(64%的回应者)、临床研究(62%)、患者护理(61%),以及不太常见的质量保证和教育。25家机构表示他们没有维护登记系统,但其中22家(88%)表示有兴趣开发一个。似乎不太可能设计出一个单一系统来满足所有机构的需求,现有的登记系统也不太可能成功“联网”。这不仅是因为现有登记系统中数据的多样性,还因为不同机构使用基本术语的方式存在重要差异。对于有兴趣开发自己登记系统的烧伤护理机构,提供了一份成功的代表性登记系统的选定列表。