Suppr超能文献

烧伤面积估计的可靠性:一项研究。

Burn size estimate reliability: a study.

作者信息

Miller S F, Finley R K, Waltman M, Lincks J

机构信息

Miami Valley Hospital Regional Adult Burn Unit, Dayton, OH.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):546-59. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199111000-00010.

Abstract

A study was undertaken to assess any differences between physicians' and nurses' estimates of burn size from drawings of 10 hypothetical patients with burns. Patient drawings were sent to the 199 burn facilities that are listed in the American Burn Association's Burn Care Resources in North America 1989-1990. The mailings were randomized between physicians and nurses. In order to have an even distribution, the cover letter asked the individual who received the forms to fill them out himself or herself rather than to pass them on to someone else. Forty-one nurses and 16 doctors (29%) returned the completed forms. The length of experience in burn care for the nurses averaged 9.3 years (range, 2 to 20 years), and the length of experience in burn care for the physicians averaged 14.7 years (range, 1 to 30 years [p = 0.01]). There were significant differences in the estimate of mean burn size between the physicians and nurses for only the two smallest drawings; in these cases, size may have been hard to translate from the patient to the drawing. There were four smaller burn charts (less than 20% body surface area), and in two (50%) of these, there were significant differences in the estimation of the burn size. For the six larger burn charts (greater than 20% body surface area), there were no differences in the size estimates. With regression analysis, no trend was noted that correlated the size estimates with the length of experience in burn care for either the physicians or the nurses. Additionally, the participants were asked to indicate which method of estimating burn size was used in their units. Thirty-five percent use the Rule of Nines, 33% use the Lund & Browder chart, 5.3% use Berkow's method, 3% use other methods, and 1.75% use a combination of the Lund & Browder chart and the Rule of Nines. Twenty-one percent failed to indicate any preferred method. Estimates of burn sizes with the use of standardized burn forms were consistently the same whether estimates were made by physicians or nurses. Sixty-eight percent of the respondents used the Rule of Nines or the Lund & Browder chart to estimate burn size, but 21% of the respondents failed to answer the question about which method is used in their units. In conclusion, there appears to be little variance in estimation of burn size as made by experienced burn nurses and physicians, and use of these estimates in a centralized data bank should be reliable.

摘要

一项研究旨在评估医生和护士根据10例假设烧伤患者的绘图对烧伤面积的估计是否存在差异。患者绘图被发送给了美国烧伤协会1989 - 1990年北美烧伤护理资源中列出的199家烧伤机构。邮件在医生和护士之间随机发送。为了均匀分布,附信要求收到表格的个人自己填写,而不是转交给其他人。41名护士和16名医生(29%)返回了填好的表格。护士的烧伤护理平均经验年限为9.3年(范围为2至20年),医生的烧伤护理平均经验年限为14.7年(范围为1至30年[p = 0.01])。仅在两张最小的绘图中,医生和护士对平均烧伤面积的估计存在显著差异;在这些情况下,烧伤面积可能很难从患者情况转化为绘图。有四张较小的烧伤图表(体表面积小于20%),其中两张(50%)在烧伤面积估计上存在显著差异。对于六张较大的烧伤图表(体表面积大于20%),面积估计没有差异。通过回归分析,未发现医生或护士的烧伤面积估计与烧伤护理经验年限之间存在相关趋势。此外,参与者被要求指出他们所在单位使用的烧伤面积估计方法。35%使用九分法,33%使用伦德与布劳德图表,5.3%使用伯克方法,3%使用其他方法,1.75%同时使用伦德与布劳德图表和九分法。21%未指出任何首选方法。无论估计是由医生还是护士进行,使用标准化烧伤表格对烧伤面积的估计始终相同。68%的受访者使用九分法或伦德与布劳德图表来估计烧伤面积,但21%的受访者未回答关于他们所在单位使用何种方法的问题。总之,经验丰富的烧伤护士和医生对烧伤面积的估计似乎差异不大,在集中数据库中使用这些估计应该是可靠的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验