• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别疼痛差距:19 个欧洲国家的疼痛性别不平等

The Gender Pain Gap: gender inequalities in pain across 19 European countries.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):287-294. doi: 10.1177/1403494820987466. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1177/1403494820987466
PMID:33568013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8873965/
Abstract

AIMS

Chronic pain is increasingly considered to be an international public health issue, yet gender differences in chronic pain in Europe are under-examined. This work aimed to examine gender inequalities in pain across Europe.

METHODS

Data for 27,552 men and women aged 25-74 years in 19 European countries were taken from the social determinants of health module of the European Social Survey (2014). Inequalities in reporting pain were measured by means of adjusted rate differences (ARD) and relative adjusted rate risks (ARR).

RESULTS

At the pooled pan-European level, a greater proportion of women (62.3%) reported pain than men (55.5%) (ARD 5.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.1, 6.9), ARR 1.10 (95% CI 1.08, 1.13)). These inequalities were greatest for back/neck pain (ARD 5.8% (95% CI 4.4, 7.1), ARR 1.15 (95% CI 1.12, 1.19)), but were also significant for hand/arm pain (ARD 4.6% (95% CI 3.5, 5.7), ARR 1.24 (95% CI 1.17, 1.30)) and foot/leg pain (ARD 2.6% (95% CI 1.5, 3.8), ARR 1.12 (95% CI 1.07, 1.18)). There was considerable cross-national variation in gender pain inequalities across European countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gender pain inequalities exist across Europe whereby women experience more pain than men. The extent of the gender pain gap varies by country. The gender pain gap is a public health concern and should be considered in future prevention and management strategies.

摘要

目的

慢性疼痛日益被视为国际公共卫生问题,但欧洲对慢性疼痛的性别差异研究不足。本研究旨在探讨欧洲慢性疼痛的性别不平等问题。

方法

本研究的数据来自欧洲社会调查(2014 年)健康决定因素模块中 19 个欧洲国家的 27552 名 25-74 岁的男性和女性。通过调整率差异(ARD)和相对调整率风险(ARR)来衡量报告疼痛的不平等。

结果

在整个欧洲,更多的女性(62.3%)报告有疼痛,而男性(55.5%)(ARD 5.5%(95%可信区间(CI)为 4.1,6.9),ARR 1.10(95% CI 为 1.08,1.13))。背部/颈部疼痛的性别不平等最为显著(ARD 5.8%(95% CI 为 4.4,7.1),ARR 1.15(95% CI 为 1.12,1.19)),但手部/手臂疼痛(ARD 4.6%(95% CI 为 3.5,5.7),ARR 1.24(95% CI 为 1.17,1.30))和脚部/腿部疼痛(ARD 2.6%(95% CI 为 1.5,3.8),ARR 1.12(95% CI 为 1.07,1.18))也存在显著的性别不平等。欧洲各国之间的性别疼痛不平等存在相当大的差异。

结论

欧洲存在显著的性别疼痛不平等,女性比男性经历更多的疼痛。国家之间的性别疼痛差距大小不一。性别疼痛差距是一个公共卫生问题,应在未来的预防和管理策略中加以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b4/8873965/e0ccce743f76/10.1177_1403494820987466-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b4/8873965/e0ccce743f76/10.1177_1403494820987466-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92b4/8873965/e0ccce743f76/10.1177_1403494820987466-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Gender Pain Gap: gender inequalities in pain across 19 European countries.性别疼痛差距:19 个欧洲国家的疼痛性别不平等
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):287-294. doi: 10.1177/1403494820987466. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
The European epidemic: Pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries.欧洲疫情:19个欧洲国家的疼痛患病率及疼痛方面的社会经济不平等现象
Eur J Pain. 2019 Sep;23(8):1425-1436. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1409. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Occupational inequalities in self-rated health and non-communicable diseases in different regions of Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲不同地区自评健康状况和非传染性疾病方面的职业不平等:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw223.
4
The social determinants of inequalities in self-reported health in Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲自我报告健康不平等状况的社会决定因素:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw217.
5
The socioeconomic distribution of non-communicable diseases in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲非传染性疾病的社会经济分布:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):22-26. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw222.
6
The contribution of housing and neighbourhood conditions to educational inequalities in non-communicable diseases in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.住房和邻里条件对欧洲非传染性疾病教育不平等的影响:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):102-106. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw224.
7
The influence of gender equality policies on gender inequalities in health in Europe.欧洲性别平等政策对健康领域性别不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Regional inequalities in self-reported conditions and non-communicable diseases in European countries: Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲国家自我报告的健康状况和非传染性疾病的地区不平等:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):14-21. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw227.
9
Gender inequalities in mental wellbeing in 26 European countries: do welfare regimes matter?26个欧洲国家心理健康方面的性别不平等:福利制度有影响吗?
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Oct;26(5):872-876. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw074. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Educational inequalities in diabetes mortality across Europe in the 2000s: the interaction with gender.21世纪欧洲糖尿病死亡率方面的教育不平等:与性别的相互作用。
Int J Public Health. 2015 May;60(4):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0669-8. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between loneliness and pain, and the role of physical health and distress: an analysis in 139 countries.孤独与疼痛之间的关联以及身体健康和痛苦的作用:对139个国家的分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15151-0.
2
Social dimensions as explanatory approaches for the development of chronic pain: a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies.社会维度作为慢性疼痛发展的解释性方法:定性研究的元民族志
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02560-w.
3
The silence of opioids-dependent chronic pain patients: A text mining analysis from sex and gender perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study.荷兰阿片类药物使用和滥用趋势:回顾性、多源数据库研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Oct;4(10):e498-e505. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
The European epidemic: Pain prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in pain across 19 European countries.欧洲疫情:19个欧洲国家的疼痛患病率及疼痛方面的社会经济不平等现象
Eur J Pain. 2019 Sep;23(8):1425-1436. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1409. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Who benefits from social investment? The gendered effects of family and employment policies on cardiovascular disease in Europe.
阿片类药物依赖慢性疼痛患者的沉默:基于性别视角的文本挖掘分析
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319574. eCollection 2025.
4
Gendered dimension of chronic pain patients with low and middle income: A text mining analysis.低收入和中等收入慢性疼痛患者的性别维度:一项文本挖掘分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0311292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311292. eCollection 2024.
5
Associations among frailty conditions and pain indicators: Data from 22 356 European older adults.衰弱状况与疼痛指标之间的关联:来自22356名欧洲老年人的数据。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Dec;24(12):1362-1369. doi: 10.1111/ggi.15016. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
6
Gender Differences in Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation Alterations in Healthy Volunteers by Acupuncture on Left "LI 15": A Resting-State fMRI Study.针刺左侧“LI 15”穴位对健康志愿者低频振幅变化的性别差异:一项静息态 fMRI 研究。
Behav Neurol. 2024 Oct 28;2024:3986094. doi: 10.1155/2024/3986094. eCollection 2024.
7
PROGRESS: A patient-centered engagement infrastructure and multi-level approach to enrich diversity, equity, and inclusion in a national randomized online behavioral pain treatment study.进展:在一项全国性随机在线行为疼痛治疗研究中,以患者为中心的参与基础设施和多层次方法,以丰富多样性、公平性和包容性。
J Pain. 2024 Oct 23:104718. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104718.
8
How pain is misunderstood and ignored in women.疼痛在女性中是如何被误解和忽视的。
Nature. 2024 Sep;633(8031):S31-S33. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-03005-0.
9
Understanding the Impact of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain on Daily Life from a Gender Perspective Using the PAIN_Integral Scale©.从性别视角出发,使用PAIN_Integral量表©理解慢性非癌性疼痛对日常生活的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;12(6):695. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060695.
10
"SO FAR AWAY" How Doctors Can Contribute to Making Endometriosis Hell on Earth. A Call for Humanistic Medicine and Empathetic Practice for Genuine Person-Centered Care. A Narrative Review.《如此遥远》:医生如何助力让子宫内膜异位症成为人间炼狱。呼吁人文医学与共情实践以实现真正的以患者为中心的护理。一篇叙述性综述
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Feb 19;16:273-287. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S440542. eCollection 2024.
谁从社会投资中受益?家庭和就业政策对欧洲心血管疾病的性别影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):206-213. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211283. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
The Pain Divide: a cross-sectional analysis of chronic pain prevalence, pain intensity and opioid utilisation in England.疼痛差异:对英格兰慢性疼痛患病率、疼痛强度和阿片类药物使用情况的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(7):e023391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023391.
5
The association between diabetes and depressive symptoms varies by quality of diabetes care across Europe.糖尿病与抑郁症状之间的关联因欧洲各地糖尿病护理质量的不同而有所差异。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Oct 1;28(5):872-878. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky050.
6
Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions - A research agenda.理解健康的微观和宏观政治:不平等、交叉性与机构 - 研究议程。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
7
How social policy contributes to the distribution of population health: the case of gender health equity.社会政策如何促进人口健康的分配:以性别健康公平为例。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(1):6-17. doi: 10.1177/1403494817715954. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
Gender Policies and Gender Inequalities in Health in Europe: Results of the SOPHIE Project.欧洲的性别政策与健康领域的性别不平等:索菲项目的成果
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Jan;47(1):61-82. doi: 10.1177/0020731416662611. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
9
A global assessment of the gender gap in self-reported health with survey data from 59 countries.利用来自59个国家的调查数据对自我报告健康方面的性别差距进行全球评估。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 30;16:675. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3352-y.
10
Gender differences in pain and its relief.疼痛及其缓解方面的性别差异。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):184-9. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_09.