Suppr超能文献

与蒙特利尔认知评估相比,简易精神状态检查表对老年住院患者认知障碍的低估:横断面观察性研究

Underestimation of Cognitive Impairment in Older Inpatients by the Abbreviated Mental Test Score versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

作者信息

Emery Alexander, Wells James, Klaus Stephen P, Mather Melissa, Pessoa Ana, Pendlebury Sarah T

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Geratology John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2020 Dec 15;10(3):205-215. doi: 10.1159/000509357. eCollection 2020 Sep-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cognitive impairment is prevalent in older inpatients but may be unrecognized. Screening to identify cognitive deficits is therefore important to optimize care. The 10-point Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) is widely used in acute hospital settings but its reliability for mild versus more severe cognitive impairment is unknown. We therefore studied the AMTS versus the 30-point Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older (≥75 years) inpatients.

METHODS

The AMTS and MoCA were administered to consecutive hospitalized patients at ≥72 h after admission in a prospective observational study. MoCA testing time was recorded. Reliability of the AMTS for the reference standard defined as mild (MoCA <26) or moderate/severe (MoCA <18) cognitive impairment was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of low AMTS (<8) for cognitive impairment were determined.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients (mean/SD age = 84.9/6.3 years, 96 (46.8%) male, 74 (36.1%) dementia/delirium), mean/SD AMTS was 7.2/2.3, and mean/SD MoCA was 16.1/6.2 with mean/SD testing time = 17.9/7.2 min. 96/205 (46.8%) had low AMTS whereas 174/185 (94%) had low MoCA: 74/185 (40.0%) had mild and 100 (54.0%) had moderate/severe impairment. Moderate/severe cognitive impairment was more prevalent in the low versus the normal AMTS group: 74/83 (90%) versus 25/102 (25%, < 0.0001). AUC of the AMTS for mild and moderate/severe impairment were 0.86 (95% CI = 0.80-0.93) and 0.88 (0.82-0.93), respectively. Specificity of AMTS <8 for both mild and moderate/severe cognitive impairment was high (100%, 71.5-100, and 92.7%, 84.8-97.3) but sensitivity was lower (44.8%, 37.0-52.8, and 72.8%, 62.6-81.6, respectively). The negative predictive value of AMTS <8 was therefore low for mild impairment (10.9%, 5.6-18.7) but much higher for moderate/severe impairment (75.2%, 65.7-83.3). All MoCA subtests discriminated between low and normal AMTS groups (all < 0.0001, except = 0.002 for repetition) but deficits in delayed recall, verbal fluency and visuo-executive function were prevalent even in the normal AMTS group.

CONCLUSION

The AMTS is highly specific but relatively insensitive for cognitive impairment: a quarter of those with normal AMTS had moderate/severe impairment on the MoCA with widespread deficits. The AMTS cannot therefore be used as a "rule-out" test, and more detailed cognitive assessment will be required in selected patients.

摘要

背景/目的:认知障碍在老年住院患者中很常见,但可能未被识别。因此,进行筛查以发现认知缺陷对于优化护理很重要。10分的简易精神状态检查表(AMTS)在急性医院环境中广泛使用,但其对于轻度与重度认知障碍的可靠性尚不清楚。因此,我们对老年(≥75岁)住院患者的AMTS与30分的蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)进行了研究。

方法

在一项前瞻性观察研究中,对入院≥72小时的连续住院患者进行AMTS和MoCA评估。记录MoCA测试时间。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估AMTS对于定义为轻度(MoCA<26)或中度/重度(MoCA<18)认知障碍的参考标准的可靠性。确定低AMTS(<8)对认知障碍的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

在205例患者中(平均/标准差年龄=84.9/6.3岁,96例(46.8%)为男性,74例(36.1%)患有痴呆/谵妄),平均/标准差AMTS为7.2/2.3,平均/标准差MoCA为16.1/6.2,平均/标准差测试时间=17.9/7.2分钟。205例中有96例(46.8%)AMTS较低,而18

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54e/7841750/44390e65727d/dee-0010-0205-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验