Leiro-Fernández Virginia, Fernández-Villar Alberto
Pulmonary Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo Health Area, Vigo, Spain.
NeumoVigoI+i Research Group, Vigo Biomedical Research Institute (IBIV), Vigo, Spain.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):496-505. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.08.
The staging of mediastinal lymph nodes for lung cancer is crucial for planning treatments or reinterventions. In potentially curable patients the aim of mediastinal staging is to exclude the presence of malignancy in mediastinal lymph nodes with a high level of accuracy while also considering clinical factors and the balance of the benefits and risks of tissue sampling techniques. Mediastinal staging is based on computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) and can be sufficient when no mediastinal abnormalities are present and the probability of unforeseen N2 disease is low. In the case of bulky lymph nodes with a high probability of malignancy in PET-CT, tissue confirmation is not normally required. If mediastinal sampling is needed it can be achieved by endosonographic techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or a combination of the two. Positive results do not need further confirmation. In the case of negative results, surgical techniques still play a role in the selected cases discussed by multidisciplinary lung cancer committees. New mediastinal surgical techniques including video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy (VACM), video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA), and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) have been shown to be useful in selected patients. Final pathological staging is based on lymph node removal during surgery and can be achieved by taking one of two approaches: lymph node sampling or systematic lymph node sampling. The accuracy of PET-CT and mediastinal endosonography is lower for mediastinal restaging than it is for surgical techniques; their false positive and false negative (FN) rate is high and so, they require histological confirmation. Here we explain and revise the results from the most recent studies and current international guidelines.
肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期对于治疗方案的制定或再次干预至关重要。对于潜在可治愈的患者,纵隔分期的目的是在考虑临床因素以及组织采样技术的利弊平衡的同时,高精度地排除纵隔淋巴结存在恶性肿瘤的情况。纵隔分期基于计算机断层扫描(CT)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET),当纵隔无异常且意外发生N2期疾病的可能性较低时,这种分期可能就足够了。对于PET-CT显示有大概率为恶性的肿大淋巴结,通常不需要进行组织确认。如果需要进行纵隔采样,可以通过内镜超声技术实现,包括支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)和内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)或两者联合使用。阳性结果无需进一步确认。对于阴性结果,在多学科肺癌委员会讨论的特定病例中,手术技术仍发挥作用。包括电视辅助颈部纵隔镜检查(VACM)、电视辅助纵隔镜淋巴结切除术(VAMLA)和经颈扩大纵隔淋巴结切除术(TEMLA)在内的新纵隔手术技术已被证明对特定患者有用。最终的病理分期基于手术中切除的淋巴结,可通过以下两种方法之一实现:淋巴结采样或系统性淋巴结采样。PET-CT和纵隔内镜超声用于纵隔再分期的准确性低于手术技术;它们的假阳性和假阴性(FN)率较高,因此需要组织学确认。在此,我们解释并修订了最新研究结果和当前国际指南。