• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字筛查认知障碍 - 概念验证研究。

Digital Screening for Cognitive Impairment - A Proof of Concept Study.

机构信息

Victor Bloniecki, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska Uinversity Hospital, Eugeniavägen 3, SE-17176, Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 70-726 82 20; Email:

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):127-134. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.2.

DOI:10.14283/jpad.2021.2
PMID:33569558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to an ageing demographic and rapid increase of cognitive impairment and dementia, combined with potential disease-modifying drugs and other interventions in the pipeline, there is a need for the development of accurate, accessible and efficient cognitive screening instruments, focused on early-stage detection of neurodegenerative disorders.

OBJECTIVE

In this proof of concept report, we examine the validity of a newly developed digital cognitive test, the Geras Solutions Cognitive Test (GCST) and compare its accuracy against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

METHODS

106 patients, referred to the memory clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, due to memory complaints were included. All patients were assessed for presence of neurodegenerative disorder in accordance with standard investigative procedures. 66% were diagnosed with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), 25% with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 9% fulfilled criteria for dementia. All patients were administered both MoCA and GSCT. Descriptive statistics and specificity, sensitivity and ROC curves were established for both test.

RESULTS

Mean score differed significantly between all diagnostic subgroups for both GSCT and MoCA (p<0.05). GSCT total test time differed significantly between all diagnostic subgroups (p<0.05). Overall, MoCA showed a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.54 at a cut-off of <=26 while GSCT displayed 0.91 and 0.55 in sensitivity and specificity respectively at a cut-off of <=45.

CONCLUSION

This report suggests that GSCT is a viable cognitive screening instrument for both MCI and dementia.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化以及认知障碍和痴呆症的迅速增加,再加上潜在的疾病修饰药物和其他干预措施正在研发中,因此需要开发准确、易于获取和高效的认知筛查工具,专注于早期发现神经退行性疾病。

目的

在本概念验证报告中,我们研究了一种新开发的数字认知测试——Geras Solutions Cognitive Test(GCST)的有效性,并将其准确性与 Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)进行比较。

方法

106 名因记忆问题而被转诊到卡罗林斯卡大学医院记忆诊所的患者被纳入本研究。所有患者均按照标准检查程序评估是否存在神经退行性疾病。66%的患者被诊断为主观认知障碍(SCI),25%的患者被诊断为轻度认知障碍(MCI),9%的患者符合痴呆症的诊断标准。所有患者均接受了 MoCA 和 GSCT 测试。为两种测试建立了描述性统计、特异性、敏感性和 ROC 曲线。

结果

GSCT 和 MoCA 的平均得分在所有诊断亚组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。GSCT 的总测试时间在所有诊断亚组之间也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。总体而言,MoCA 的灵敏度为 0.88,特异性为 0.54,截断值为 <=26;而 GSCT 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.91 和 0.55,截断值为 <=45。

结论

本报告表明,GSCT 是一种用于 MCI 和痴呆症的可行认知筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Digital Screening for Cognitive Impairment - A Proof of Concept Study.数字筛查认知障碍 - 概念验证研究。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):127-134. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.2.
2
Comparison of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an Australian geriatrics clinic.在澳大利亚老年病诊所中,快速轻度认知障碍(Qmci)筛查与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;32(6):643-649. doi: 10.1002/gps.4505. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Comparison of "MCI Specific" Screening Instruments.轻度认知障碍的筛查:“MCI 特异性”筛查工具的比较
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(2):619-29. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150881.
4
Short Montreal Cognitive Assessment.简易蒙特利尔认知评估量表
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):104-108. doi: 10.1177/0891988716673469. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Mexico.用于检测墨西哥认知障碍的蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)西班牙语版本的效度和信度
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct-Dec;47(4):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
6
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia.蒙特利尔认知评估优于简易精神状态检查,可用于检测痴呆风险较高的患者。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Nov;24(11):1749-55. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001068. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis.在60岁以上人群的轻度认知障碍(MCI)检测中,蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)测试是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更适用?荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Oct 31;50(5):1039-1052. doi: 10.12740/PP/45368.
8
MACE versus MoCA: equivalence or superiority? Pragmatic diagnostic test accuracy study.MACE 与 MoCA:等效还是优越?实用诊断测试准确性研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jun;29(6):931-937. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216002210. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Optimal cutoff scores for dementia and mild cognitive impairment of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among elderly and oldest-old Chinese population.蒙特利尔认知评估量表在高龄及超高龄中国人群中痴呆和轻度认知障碍的最佳临界值
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(4):1403-12. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141278.
10
Screening utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): in place of--or as well as--the MMSE?蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的筛查效用:替代——还是补充——简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Mar;24(3):391-6. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001839. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone- and Tablet-Based Tools to Assess Cognition in Individuals With Preclinical Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review.基于智能手机和平板电脑的工具用于评估临床前阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍个体的认知:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e65297. doi: 10.2196/65297.
2
Validity and reliability of a digital solution for cognitive assessment: The Brain on Track®.一种用于认知评估的数字解决方案“大脑在线”(Brain on Track®)的有效性和可靠性。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241287371. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287371. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Validation of a web-based self-administered test for cognitive assessment in a Swedish geriatric setting.
验证一种基于网络的自我管理认知评估测试在瑞典老年人群体中的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 1;19(2):e0297575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297575. eCollection 2024.
4
Validity, feasibility, and effectiveness of a voice-recognition based digital cognitive screener for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older Chinese adults: A large-scale implementation study.基于语音识别的数字认知筛查工具在社区居住的老年华裔成年人中用于痴呆和轻度认知障碍的有效性、可行性和效果:一项大规模实施研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Apr;20(4):2384-2396. doi: 10.1002/alz.13668. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis.认知评估中数字工具的研究:一项文献计量分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 23;14:1227261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227261. eCollection 2023.
6
A voice recognition-based digital cognitive screener for dementia detection in the community: Development and validation study.一种基于语音识别的社区痴呆症检测数字认知筛查工具:开发与验证研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 22;13:899729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899729. eCollection 2022.
7
Intercepting Dementia: Awareness and Innovation as Key Tools.拦截痴呆症:意识与创新是关键工具。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Oct 13;13:730727. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.730727. eCollection 2021.