• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分片式内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大型肿瘤后的最佳监测间隔:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Optimal surveillance interval after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08311-6. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08311-6
PMID:33569725
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colorectal neoplastic lesions (≥ 20 mm) are commonly treated via piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (p-EMR) but have a high rate of local recurrence. We aimed to clarify the optimal surveillance interval after p-EMR for these neoplasias.

METHODS

In this multicenter (15 participating institutions) prospective, randomized trial, 180 patients recruited over a 4-year period and were classified based on tumor location, tumor diameter, histological diagnosis, institution, and number of resected specimens. The patients underwent curative p-EMR followed by scheduled surveillance colonoscopy at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after p-EMR (group A; n = 90) or at 6, 12, and 24 months after p-EMR (group B; n = 90). The primary endpoint was cumulative local recurrence at 6 months after p-EMR. Secondary endpoints included local recurrence and the cumulative surgical resection rate of recurrent tumors during the 24-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

The median tumor diameter was 25 mm (IQR 20-30). Six months after p-EMR, 12 and 6 local recurrences were noted in groups A and B, which corresponded to 13 and 8 recurrences, respectively, during the 24-month surveillance period. The primary and secondary endpoints of recurrence were not significantly different between the groups on either intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis; no surgery case was observed in group B when a strict surveillance protocol of 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up post-EMR was followed.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who underwent p-EMR for neoplastic lesions, additional postprocedural 3-month surveillance did not show superior results in detecting recurrence compared with a 6-month surveillance interval.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000015740.

摘要

背景与目的

结直肠肿瘤性病变(≥20mm)常采用分片内镜黏膜切除术(p-EMR)治疗,但局部复发率较高。本研究旨在明确此类肿瘤行 p-EMR 后的最佳随访间隔。

方法

这是一项多中心(15 家参与机构)前瞻性随机试验,于 4 年内纳入 180 例患者,根据肿瘤位置、肿瘤直径、组织学诊断、机构和切除标本数量进行分类。所有患者行根治性 p-EMR 治疗,然后在 p-EMR 后 3、6、12 和 24 个月(A 组,n=90)或 p-EMR 后 6、12 和 24 个月(B 组,n=90)进行计划随访结肠镜检查。主要终点为 p-EMR 后 6 个月时的累积局部复发率。次要终点包括 24 个月随访期间的局部复发率和复发性肿瘤的累积手术切除率。

结果

肿瘤直径中位数为 25mm(IQR 20-30)。p-EMR 后 6 个月,A 组和 B 组分别有 12 例和 6 例局部复发,在 24 个月的随访期间,分别有 13 例和 8 例复发。意向治疗和按方案分析的两组间复发的主要和次要终点均无显著差异;B 组严格遵循 EMR 后 6、12 和 24 个月的随访方案,未观察到手术病例。

结论

对于接受 p-EMR 治疗的肿瘤性病变患者,与 6 个月的随访间隔相比,额外的术后 3 个月随访并未显示出在检测复发方面的优势。

临床试验注册

UMIN000015740。

相似文献

1
Optimal surveillance interval after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.分片式内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大型肿瘤后的最佳监测间隔:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08311-6. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection.内镜切除术后局部复发的危险因素及适当的监测间隔。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 28;25(12):1502-1512. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1502.
3
Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.经内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)热消融与无辅助治疗(RESPECT)后高级无蒂和侧向蔓延型结直肠腺瘤复发的国际随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 17;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07915-2.
4
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗内镜黏膜切除术后复发性结直肠肿瘤的可行性
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Jul-Sep;82(3):375-378.
5
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.与传统的内镜下黏膜切除术相比,对于大型结直肠息肉,水下内镜黏膜切除术的复发率较低,且能更早进行治愈性切除。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4174-4183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5474-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.无蒂结直肠病变内镜黏膜切除术后的局部复发:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):388-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗远端大肠广基腺瘤的比较(MATILDA试验):一项多中心随机临床试验的原理与设计
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 May 26;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0468-6.
8
Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial.内镜整块切除与分片切除大型无蒂结直肠腺瘤的随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M23-1812. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
9
Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.黏膜缺损边缘热消融可降低结肠内镜黏膜切除术腺瘤复发率。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb;156(3):604-613.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
10
Outcomes of endoscopic treatment of second recurrences of large nonpedunculated colorectal adenomas.大型无蒂结直肠腺瘤二次复发的内镜治疗结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2457-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4497-y. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Of Endpoints and Equipoise: Reforming Clinical Trials in Colorectal Polyp Resection.关于终点与均衡性:改革结直肠息肉切除术的临床试验
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Sep 18;27(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01013-2.
2
Surveillance after Endoscopic Resection for Colorectal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review.结直肠肿瘤内镜切除术后的监测:一项综述
Digestion. 2025;106(2):131-137. doi: 10.1159/000542665. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Effectiveness of water pressure method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by novice endoscopists.
新手内镜医师采用水压法进行大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的有效性
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jul 11;11(7):E641-E648. doi: 10.1055/a-2102-7578. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.在内镜黏膜切除术中实现高质量切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):338-353. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.