University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
School of Dentistry of the University of Passo Fundo, Rua Silva Jardim, 391-1301, Passo Fundo, RS, 99010-240, Brazil.
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 11;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00286-8.
This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the marginal bone loss and peri-implant aspects in patients with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants and assess patient satisfaction, prosthesis-related clinical outcomes, and masticatory efficiency.
Patients from the School of Dentistry of the University of Passo Fundo (UPF) with lower conventional complete dentures dissatisfied with prosthetic retention were selected. Eighteen patients were analyzed and divided into randomized treatment groups: GA, installation of one implant in the midline of the mandibular symphysis (8 patients), and GB, installation of two implants in the lower canine region (10 patients). Implant survival and prosthetic maintenance were assessed by clinical and radiographic examinations performed 6 months after implant placement and 3 months after loading. Finally, the masticatory efficiency of the prostheses was evaluated with the QoLIP-10 (Quality of Life with Implant-Prostheses) questionnaire, and the degree of patient satisfaction used the visual analog scale (VAS).
Regarding the esthetic satisfaction of the patients, there was no statistical difference between the two groups studied (p = 0.680). Patients who received two implants presented easier chewing (p = 0.049) and a lower average number of prosthesis maintenance. There was no difference between the groups regarding peri-implant bone resorption 3 months after the use of prostheses.
The use of two dental implants showed higher masticatory ability and lower need for maintenance appointments when compared with one implant in mandibular overdentures but did not affect peri-implant aspects and patient satisfaction. The treatment using one implant was effective for the aspects evaluated, but further clinical studies are required on the subject.
本随机临床试验旨在评估由一个或两个种植体保留的下颌覆盖义齿的边缘骨丢失和种植体周围情况,并评估患者满意度、义齿相关临床结果和咀嚼效率。
选择来自巴西帕索芬多大学牙科学院、对常规全口义齿修复体保持力不满意的下颌传统全口义齿患者。对 18 名患者进行了分析,并随机分为两组:GA 组,在下颌正中联合区植入一个种植体(8 例);GB 组,在下颌尖牙区植入两个种植体(10 例)。在种植体植入后 6 个月和加载后 3 个月进行临床和影像学检查,评估种植体存活率和修复体维护情况。最后,使用 QoLIP-10(植入物-义齿的生活质量)问卷评估义齿的咀嚼效率,并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的满意度。
在患者的美学满意度方面,两组之间没有统计学差异(p = 0.680)。植入两个种植体的患者咀嚼更轻松(p = 0.049),需要维护的次数更少。在使用义齿 3 个月后,两组之间的种植体周围骨吸收没有差异。
与下颌覆盖义齿中的一个种植体相比,使用两个牙科种植体具有更高的咀嚼能力和更低的维护预约需求,但不会影响种植体周围情况和患者满意度。使用一个种植体的治疗在评估的方面是有效的,但需要进一步的临床研究。