Kanazawa Manabu, Tanoue Mariko, Miyayasu Anna, Takeshita Shin, Sato Daisuke, Asami Mari, Lam Thuy Vo, Thu Khaing Myat, Oda Ken, Komagamine Yuriko, Minakuchi Shunsuke, Feine Jocelyne
Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Implant Center, Showa University Dental Hospital, Tokyo, Japan Oral Health and Society Division, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(20):e10721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010721.
Mandibular overdentures retained by a single implant placed in the midline of edentulous mandible have been reported to be more comfortable and function better than complete dentures. Although single-implant overdentures are still more costly than conventional complete dentures, there are a few studies which investigated whether mandibular single-implant overdentures are superior to complete dentures when patient general satisfaction is compared. The aim of this study is to assess patient general satisfaction with mandibular single-implant overdentures and complete dentures.
This study is a randomized crossover trial to compare mandibular single-implant overdentures and complete dentures in edentulous individuals. Participant recruitment is ongoing at the time of this submission. Twenty-two participants will be recruited. New mandibular complete dentures will be fabricated. A single implant will be placed in the midline of the edentulous mandible. The mucosal surface of the complete denture around the implant will be relieved for 3 months. The participants will then be randomly allocated into 2 groups according to the order of the interventions; group 1 will receive single-implant overdentures first and will wear them for 2 months, followed by complete dentures for 2 months. Group 2 will receive the same treatments in a reverse order. After experiencing the 2 interventions, the participants will choose one of the mandibular prostheses, and yearly follow-up visits are planned for 5 years. The primary outcome of this trial is patient ratings of general satisfaction on 100 mm visual analog scales. Assessments of the prostheses and oral health-related quality of life will also be recorded as patient-reported outcomes. The secondary outcomes are cost and time for treatment. Masticatory efficiency and cognitive capacity will also be recorded. Furthermore, qualitative research will be performed to investigate the factors associated with success of these mandibular denture types. Clinical outcomes, such as implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and prosthodontic complications, will also be recorded.
The results of this randomized crossover trial will clarify whether mandibular single implants and overdentures for edentulous individuals provide better patient general satisfaction when compared to conventional complete dentures.
This clinical trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (UMIN000017883).
据报道,在下颌无牙区中线植入单个种植体的下颌覆盖义齿比全口义齿更舒适且功能更好。尽管单个种植体覆盖义齿的成本仍高于传统全口义齿,但有一些研究探讨了在比较患者总体满意度时,下颌单个种植体覆盖义齿是否优于全口义齿。本研究的目的是评估患者对下颌单个种植体覆盖义齿和全口义齿的总体满意度。
本研究是一项随机交叉试验,用于比较无牙个体的下颌单个种植体覆盖义齿和全口义齿。在提交本文时,参与者招募工作正在进行中。将招募22名参与者。制作新的下颌全口义齿。在下颌无牙区中线植入单个种植体。种植体周围全口义齿的黏膜表面将进行3个月的缓冲处理。然后,参与者将根据干预顺序随机分为2组;第1组将首先佩戴单个种植体覆盖义齿2个月,然后佩戴全口义齿2个月。第2组将按相反顺序接受相同治疗。在经历这两种干预后,参与者将选择其中一种下颌修复体,并计划进行为期5年的年度随访。本试验的主要结局是患者在100mm视觉模拟量表上对总体满意度的评分。对修复体和口腔健康相关生活质量的评估也将作为患者报告的结局进行记录。次要结局是治疗成本和时间。还将记录咀嚼效率和认知能力。此外,将进行定性研究以调查与这些下颌义齿类型成功相关的因素。还将记录临床结局,如种植体存活率、边缘骨丢失和修复并发症。
这项随机交叉试验的结果将阐明,与传统全口义齿相比,无牙个体的下颌单个种植体和覆盖义齿是否能为患者提供更高的总体满意度。
本临床试验已在大学医院医学信息网络(UMIN)中心注册(UMIN000017883)。