Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Feb;24(2):e25666. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25666.
Youth engagement in HIV research is generally recognized as essential, but often neglected or minimally implemented in practice. Engagement is a process of working collaboratively with diverse groups of people to address common issues. We conducted a scoping review of youth HIV prevention interventions in sub-Saharan Africa to identify and categorize forms and levels of youth engagement across the lifespan of intervention research.
We followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework for organizing a scoping review. We searched seven databases for related articles on identified intervention studies through May 28 2020. Included studies focused on youth (10 to 24 years old) HIV prevention interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Two reviewers independently examined citations and full manuscripts for inclusion. Data were extracted on study characteristics, location, description of youth engagement and extent of engagement. Youth engagement approaches were categorized based on Hart's ladder as substantial engagement (strong youth decision-making power), moderate engagement (shared decision making with adults), minimal engagement (no youth decision-making power) or no engagement.
We identified 3149 citations and included 112 studies reporting on 74 unique HIV interventions. Twenty-two interventions were in low-income countries, 49 in middle-income countries, and three were in both. Overall, only nine interventions (12%) had substantial or moderate youth engagement, two-thirds (48, 65%) had minimal youth engagement and 17 interventions (23%) had no youth engagement. We also identified specific engagement strategies (e.g. youth-led research, crowdsourcing) that were feasible in multiple settings and resulted in substantial engagement.
We found limited youth engagement in youth HIV prevention intervention studies in sub-Saharan Africa. However, several activities resulted in substantial youth engagement and could be relevant in many low-and-middle-income-country (LMIC) settings.
青年参与艾滋病毒研究通常被认为是至关重要的,但在实践中往往被忽视或很少实施。参与是与不同群体合作解决共同问题的过程。我们对撒哈拉以南非洲的青年艾滋病毒预防干预措施进行了范围界定审查,以确定和分类整个干预研究过程中青年参与的形式和程度。
我们遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架组织范围界定审查。我们通过 2020 年 5 月 28 日之前在七个数据库中搜索与确定的干预研究相关的文章来识别相关文章。纳入的研究侧重于撒哈拉以南非洲的青年(10 至 24 岁)艾滋病毒预防干预措施。两名审查员独立检查引文和全文以确定纳入情况。提取研究特征、地点、青年参与情况描述和参与程度的数据。根据 Hart 的阶梯,将青年参与方法分为实质性参与(青年有较强的决策能力)、适度参与(与成年人共同决策)、最小参与(青年无决策权)或无参与。
我们确定了 3149 条引文,并纳入了 112 项研究报告的 74 项独特的艾滋病毒干预措施。22 项干预措施在低收入国家进行,49 项在中等收入国家进行,3 项在这两个国家都进行。总体而言,只有 9 项干预措施(12%)有实质性或适度的青年参与,三分之二(48%,65%)有最小的青年参与,17 项干预措施(23%)没有青年参与。我们还确定了一些可行的具体参与策略(例如,青年主导的研究、众包),这些策略在多个环境中产生了实质性的参与。
我们发现撒哈拉以南非洲的青年艾滋病毒预防干预研究中青年参与有限。然而,一些活动导致了实质性的青年参与,并且在许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)环境中可能是相关的。