• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立言语病理学的协作研究实践社区并支持研究参与:确定利益相关者的优先事项。

Building a collaborative research community of practice and supporting research engagement in speech-language pathology: identification of stakeholder priorities.

作者信息

McCurtin Arlene, O'Connor Anne

机构信息

School of Allied Health.

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

JBI Evid Implement. 2020 Dec;18(4):368-375. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000229.

DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000229
PMID:33570320
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinician engagement in research has the potential to improve healthcare processes and facilitate evidence-based practice. As a means to encourage clinician research engagement and links between speech-language pathology (SLP) clinicians in practice and researchers in higher education institutions, a national SLP clinician-academic research community of practice was established. The first steps for this newly formed research community was to determine stakeholder aims, to prioritize those aims and specify actions which would help respond to the stated priorities.

METHODS

The study was conducted in Ireland and the Irish Association of Speech and Language Therapists acted as a gatekeeper who forwarded a study information sheet and expression of interest form to its membership. A World Café methodology was utilized to gather data and conducted as part of the inaugural meeting where consent was retrieved. As part of this methodology, the participants created and managed their own data with the help of group facilitators.

RESULTS

Thirty six members replied expressing interest and 15 participants attended the inaugural meeting. Participants represented both clinical and research communities and identified and prioritized aims for the research community of practice. The aims were, in order of prioritization: Dissemination, Education, Enablers, Networking and Advocacy. Participants agreed that what they labelled as Dissemination was the number one priority for the newly formed research community of practice. In this context Dissemination referred to the identification of research already being conducted by participants and the sharing of that research both within the group and the larger SLP community nationally and internationally. Various actions were proposed to achieve agreed aims and these reflected a variety of targeted (e.g. development of a research database) and generic (e.g. to act as advocates) activities as well as local and national strategies including lobbying for clinical-research posts.

CONCLUSION

Clear aims, priorities and actions were identified by SLP clinical and research participants to facilitate the development of a research community of practice. This article presents the results of that exercise and outlines the priorities of participants who identified five aims in total. Dissemination was the number one priority for the newly formed research group and manifested a desire to share information about participants' research activities. The prioritized aims reflect assured thinking and form a solid co-constructed footing for the research community to develop and grow.

摘要

背景与目标

临床医生参与研究有潜力改善医疗保健流程并促进循证实践。作为鼓励临床医生参与研究以及加强言语语言病理学(SLP)临床医生与高等教育机构研究人员之间联系的一种方式,一个全国性的SLP临床医生 - 学术研究实践社区得以建立。这个新成立的研究社区的首要步骤是确定利益相关者的目标,对这些目标进行优先级排序,并明确有助于回应既定优先级的行动。

方法

该研究在爱尔兰开展,爱尔兰言语语言治疗师协会充当把关人,向其成员转发了研究信息表和兴趣表达表。采用世界咖啡屋方法收集数据,并在首次会议期间进行,会上获取了同意参与的信息。作为该方法的一部分,参与者在小组促进者的帮助下创建并管理自己的数据。

结果

三十六名成员回复表示感兴趣,15名参与者参加了首次会议。参与者代表了临床和研究社区,并确定了实践研究社区的目标并对其进行了优先级排序。这些目标按优先级顺序依次为:传播、教育、促进因素、建立联系和宣传。参与者一致认为,他们所标注的传播是新成立的实践研究社区的首要任务。在此背景下,传播是指识别参与者已经开展的研究,并在小组内部以及全国和国际范围内的更大的SLP社区中分享该研究。为实现商定的目标提出了各种行动,这些行动反映了各种有针对性的(如开发研究数据库)和一般性的(如充当倡导者)活动以及地方和国家战略,包括争取临床研究职位的游说活动。

结论

SLP临床和研究参与者确定了明确的目标、优先级和行动,以促进实践研究社区的发展。本文展示了该活动的结果,并概述了总共确定了五个目标的参与者的优先事项。传播是新成立的研究小组的首要任务,体现了分享参与者研究活动信息的愿望。这些按优先级排序的目标反映了经过深思熟虑的想法,为研究社区的发展和壮大奠定了坚实的共同构建基础。

相似文献

1
Building a collaborative research community of practice and supporting research engagement in speech-language pathology: identification of stakeholder priorities.建立言语病理学的协作研究实践社区并支持研究参与:确定利益相关者的优先事项。
JBI Evid Implement. 2020 Dec;18(4):368-375. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000229.
2
Collaborative approaches with stakeholders in speech-language pathology: Narrative literature review.与言语病理学利益相关者的合作方法:叙事文献综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2911-2925. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13123. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Perspectives of speech and language therapists in paediatric palliative care: an international exploratory study.儿科姑息治疗中医师的观点:一项国际探索性研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):558-572. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12539. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis.对失语症康复中言语语言病理学家实践共同体的评估:逻辑分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0.
5
Collaboration between parents and SLTs produces optimal outcomes for children attending speech and language therapy: Gathering the evidence.家长与言语治疗师合作可为接受言语治疗的儿童带来最佳效果:收集证据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):618-628. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12538. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.英国言语治疗师在失语症康复中对话语分析的看法和报告的实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Therapy interventions for children with neurodisabilities: a qualitative scoping study.神经发育障碍儿童的治疗干预措施:定性范围研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jan;22(3):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta22030.
9
Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: A qualitative study.利益相关者参与优先事项设定伙伴关系对慢性肾脏病研究重点的长期看法:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1111/hex.12818. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
10
Inter-professional education of prospective speech-language therapists and primary school teachers through shared professional practice placements.通过共享专业实习安排,对未来的言语治疗师和小学教师进行跨专业教育。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):426-439. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12281. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms to build research capacity in the rural health workplace: a realist synthesis.农村卫生工作场所研究能力建设机制:一项实在论综合分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 19;12:1584904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584904. eCollection 2025.
2
The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.实践共同体在医疗保健中的目标和效果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0292343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292343. eCollection 2023.
3
Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians' engagement in research: a qualitative exploration.
利用知识中介活动促进医疗辅助临床医生参与研究:一项定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e060456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456.
4
Community Engagement in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Research in Brazil, Ethiopia, and Sri Lanka: A Decolonial Approach for Global Health.社区参与巴西、埃塞俄比亚和斯里兰卡的皮肤利什曼病研究:全球健康的去殖民化方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;10:823844. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.823844. eCollection 2022.