Suppr超能文献

经导管与手术治疗成人主动脉缩窄的血流动力学和临床结局比较。

A Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Therapy in Adults in Coarctation of Aorta.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Mar;33(3):E191-E199. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter stent therapy provides similar acute reduction in coarctation of aorta (COA) gradient and systolic blood pressure (SBP) as compared with surgery. However, there are limited data comparing mid-term outcomes after transcatheter vs surgical therapy for COA. The purpose of this study was to compare temporal changes in Doppler COA gradient and SBP after transcatheter stent therapy versus surgical therapy for COA.

METHODS

A retrospective study of COA patients (≥18 years old) undergoing transcatheter stent therapy or surgical therapy at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from 2000-2018 was performed. Linear regression analyses were used to compare temporal changes in Doppler gradient and SBP between the 2 groups. Propensity matching was used to adjust for between-group differences in clinical and anatomic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 44 and 128 patients underwent transcatheter and surgical therapy, respectively; there were no significant between-group differences in the anatomy of the thoracic aorta. Both groups had similar acute reduction in Doppler peak gradient (P=.66), mean gradient (P=.41), SBP (P=.22), and upper-to-lower extremity SBP (ULE-SBP) gradient (P=.69). The median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range, 27-81 months) and 63 months (interquartile range, 41-94 months) in the transcatheter and surgical groups, respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in the temporal change in Doppler peak gradient (P-interaction=.06), mean gradient (P-interaction=.15), SBP (P-interaction=.20), and ULE-SBP gradient (P-interaction=.51).

CONCLUSIONS

These favorable short- and mid-term outcome data support the use of transcatheter therapy as an alternative to surgery in adults with COA. Further studies are required to determine if these favorable outcomes are maintained on long-term follow-up.

摘要

背景

与手术相比,经导管支架治疗可提供相似的急性降主动脉缩窄(COA)梯度和收缩压(SBP)。然而,关于 COA 的经导管与手术治疗的中期结果比较数据有限。本研究的目的是比较 COA 患者经导管支架治疗与手术治疗后多普勒 COA 梯度和 SBP 的时间变化。

方法

对明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所 2000 年至 2018 年期间接受经导管支架治疗或手术治疗的 COA 患者进行回顾性研究。采用线性回归分析比较两组间多普勒梯度和 SBP 的时间变化。采用倾向匹配法调整两组间临床和解剖特征的差异。

结果

共有 44 例和 128 例患者分别接受了经导管和手术治疗,两组胸主动脉解剖结构无显著差异。两组均有相似的急性多普勒峰值梯度(P=.66)、平均梯度(P=.41)、SBP(P=.22)和上下肢 SBP 梯度(P=.69)降低。经导管组和手术组的中位随访时间分别为 46 个月(27-81 个月)和 63 个月(41-94 个月)。两组多普勒峰值梯度(P 交互值=.06)、平均梯度(P 交互值=.15)、SBP(P 交互值=.20)和 ULE-SBP 梯度(P 交互值=.51)的时间变化无显著差异。

结论

这些短期和中期结果数据支持将经导管治疗作为成人 COA 的一种替代手术方法。需要进一步的研究来确定这些有利的结果是否在长期随访中得到维持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验