• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生保健教育中批判性思维文献的范围综述。

Scoping Review of Critical Thinking Literature in Healthcare Education.

机构信息

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Occup Ther Health Care. 2023 Jan;37(1):18-39. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1879411. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1080/07380577.2021.1879411
PMID:33571065
Abstract

Critical thinking is the process of analyzing and evaluating thinking to make decisions. Critical thinking exposes assumptions, biases, and beliefs that influence clinical reasoning. This scoping review sought to explore instructional approaches for advancing students' critical thinking in healthcare education. Through analysis of 15 articles, no common definition of critical thinking emerged, nor consensus found on measurement or instructional methods. Some alternative instructional methods such as case-based learning, reflective guided questions, and multiple case exposures, when compared to lecture, did significantly impact learner critical thinking. To determine if critical thinking is an instructional method that would impact implicit biases and healthcare outcomes, five author recommendations are offered from gaps in the existing literature to provide a pathway for future research. To effectively prepare students for clinical practice, long term outcomes are necessary to assess if critical thinking skills can be taught and become part of a professional growth mindset.

摘要

批判性思维是分析和评估思维以做出决策的过程。批判性思维揭示了影响临床推理的假设、偏见和信念。本范围综述旨在探讨在医疗保健教育中提高学生批判性思维的教学方法。通过对 15 篇文章的分析,没有出现批判性思维的共同定义,也没有就测量或教学方法达成共识。一些替代的教学方法,如基于案例的学习、反思性引导问题和多次案例暴露,与讲座相比,确实显著影响了学习者的批判性思维。为了确定批判性思维是否是一种会影响隐性偏见和医疗保健结果的教学方法,从现有文献的空白处提出了五项作者建议,为未来的研究提供了途径。为了有效地让学生为临床实践做好准备,需要进行长期的结果评估,以确定批判性思维技能是否可以教授并成为专业成长心态的一部分。

相似文献

1
Scoping Review of Critical Thinking Literature in Healthcare Education.卫生保健教育中批判性思维文献的范围综述。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2023 Jan;37(1):18-39. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1879411. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
The influences of curriculum area and student background on mindset to learning in the veterinary curriculum: a pilot study.课程领域和学生背景对兽医课程学习心态的影响:一项试点研究。
Vet Med Sci. 2019 Aug;5(3):470-482. doi: 10.1002/vms3.174. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Teaching strategies of clinical reasoning in advanced nursing clinical practice: A scoping review.高级护理临床实践中临床推理教学策略的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Feb;67:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103548. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Reflective writing in dental education to improve critical thinking and learning: A systematic review.口腔医学教育中的反思性写作以提高批判性思维和学习能力:系统评价。
J Dent Educ. 2021 Jun;85(6):778-785. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12561. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
Educational strategies in the health professions to mitigate cognitive and implicit bias impact on decision making: a scoping review.卫生专业教育策略以减轻认知和内隐偏见对决策的影响:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04371-5.
8
Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self-regulated learning theory.在护理实践中促进认知和元认知反思推理技能:自我调节学习理论
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Feb;45(4):381-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x.
9
An Appraisal of Dental Students' Perception of Integrating Reflective Practice into the Curriculum: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.牙科学生对将反思性实践融入课程的认知评估:一项干预前后研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):1084-1091. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3798.
10
Assessing reflective thinking and approaches to learning.评估反思性思维与学习方法。
J Allied Health. 2011 Fall;40(3):128-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Critical thinking and embracing Artificial Intelligence: Dual Pillars for advancing dental education.整合批判性思维与接纳人工智能:推动牙科教育的两大支柱
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Dec;36(12):1660-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
Development and Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Answer Assessment (4A) for Cognitive Assessments in Nursing Education.护理教育中认知评估的人工智能辅助答案评估(4A)的开发与评估
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(3):80. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030080.
3
Use and Perceptions of Telehealth by Pediatric Occupational Therapists Post COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情后儿科职业治疗师对远程医疗的使用及看法
Int J Telerehabil. 2025 Jan 15;16(2):e6655. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2024.6655. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring a learning model for knowledge integration and the development of critical thinking among nursing students with previous learning: a qualitative study protocol.探索一种学习模式,以整合知识并培养具有先前学习经历的护理学生的批判性思维:一项定性研究方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06118-2.
5
Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Medical Course: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Medical College in Kolkata, West Bengal, India.本科医学课程中的批判性思维和临床推理:印度西孟加拉邦加尔各答一所医学院的混合方法研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Apr 11;13:259. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146009.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Preceptoring of Graduate Nursing Students in Iraq.伊拉克护理学研究生的临床带教
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Sep 22;14:1025-1034. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S418824. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluating and comparing critical thinking skills of residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.评估和比较德黑兰医科大学住院医师的批判性思维技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04094-7.
8
Brazilian undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking need to be increased: a cross-sectional study.巴西本科护理学生的批判性思维亟待提高:一项横断面研究。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Nov 28;76(1):e20220315. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0315. eCollection 2022.