• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

熵在构建规范方程(CSE)以提高记忆测试有效性中的作用。

The Role of Entropy in Construct Specification Equations (CSE) to Improve the Validity of Memory Tests.

作者信息

Melin Jeanette, Cano Stefan, Pendrill Leslie

机构信息

Department of Measurement Science and Technology, Research Institutes of Sweden (RISE), AWL Sven Hultins Plats 5, vån 4, 412 58 Göteborg, Sweden.

Modus Outcomes, Spirella Building, Letchworth Garden City SG6 4ET, UK.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;23(2):212. doi: 10.3390/e23020212.

DOI:10.3390/e23020212
PMID:33572463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7916167/
Abstract

Commonly used rating scales and tests have been found lacking reliability and validity, for example in neurodegenerative diseases studies, owing to not making recourse to the inherent ordinality of human responses, nor acknowledging the separability of person ability and item difficulty parameters according to the well-known Rasch model. Here, we adopt an information theory approach, particularly extending deployment of the classic Brillouin entropy expression when explaining the difficulty of recalling non-verbal sequences in memory tests (i.e., Corsi Block Test and Digit Span Test): a more ordered task, of less entropy, will generally be easier to perform. Construct specification equations (CSEs) as a part of a methodological development, with entropy-based variables dominating, are found experimentally to explain ( =R2 = 0.98) and predict the construct of task difficulty for short-term memory tests using data from the NeuroMET (n = 88) and Gothenburg MCI (n = 257) studies. We propose entropy-based equivalence criteria, whereby different tasks (in the form of items) from different tests can be combined, enabling new memory tests to be formed by choosing a bespoke selection of items, leading to more efficient testing, improved reliability (reduced uncertainties) and validity. This provides opportunities for more practical and accurate measurement in clinical practice, research and trials.

摘要

人们发现,常用的评分量表和测试缺乏可靠性和有效性,例如在神经退行性疾病研究中,这是因为它们没有利用人类反应固有的顺序性,也没有根据著名的拉施模型承认个体能力和项目难度参数的可分离性。在此,我们采用一种信息论方法,特别是在解释记忆测试(即科西块测试和数字广度测试)中回忆非语言序列的难度时,扩展经典布里渊熵表达式的应用:一个更有序、熵更低的任务通常执行起来更容易。作为方法学发展的一部分,构建规范方程(CSEs),其中基于熵的变量占主导地位,通过实验发现,使用来自神经MET(n = 88)和哥德堡轻度认知障碍(n = 257)研究的数据,可以解释(=R2 = 0.98)并预测短期记忆测试的任务难度结构。我们提出基于熵的等效标准,据此可以组合来自不同测试的不同任务(以项目形式),通过选择定制的项目选择来形成新的记忆测试,从而实现更高效的测试、提高可靠性(减少不确定性)和有效性。这为临床实践、研究和试验中更实际、准确的测量提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/f3be794a009a/entropy-23-00212-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/8cd8e0b2ef26/entropy-23-00212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/f4ae0504c82f/entropy-23-00212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/4d1d97e2cc0b/entropy-23-00212-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/3753ec0d2a21/entropy-23-00212-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/1a2a7bc07bb5/entropy-23-00212-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/f3be794a009a/entropy-23-00212-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/8cd8e0b2ef26/entropy-23-00212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/f4ae0504c82f/entropy-23-00212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/4d1d97e2cc0b/entropy-23-00212-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/3753ec0d2a21/entropy-23-00212-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/1a2a7bc07bb5/entropy-23-00212-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a4c/7916167/f3be794a009a/entropy-23-00212-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Entropy in Construct Specification Equations (CSE) to Improve the Validity of Memory Tests.熵在构建规范方程(CSE)以提高记忆测试有效性中的作用。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;23(2):212. doi: 10.3390/e23020212.
2
The Role of Entropy in Construct Specification Equations (CSE) to Improve the Validity of Memory Tests: Extension to Word Lists.熵在构建规范方程(CSE)以提高记忆测试有效性中的作用:扩展到单词列表
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;24(7):934. doi: 10.3390/e24070934.
3
Forward and Backward Recalling Sequences in Spatial and Verbal Memory Tasks: What Do We Measure?空间和言语记忆任务中的正向与反向回忆序列:我们测量的是什么?
Entropy (Basel). 2023 May 18;25(5):813. doi: 10.3390/e25050813.
4
Exploring a New Application of Construct Specification Equations (CSEs) and Entropy: A Pilot Study with Balance Measurements.探索结构规范方程(CSEs)与熵的新应用:一项关于平衡测量的初步研究
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;25(6):940. doi: 10.3390/e25060940.
5
Traceability and comparability through crosswalks with the NeuroMET Memory Metric.通过与 NeuroMET 记忆指标的交叉核对实现可追溯性和可比性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32208-0.
6
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
7
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
[A neuro-psychological test (T-K-W test) for dementia based on working memory theory and item-response theory: its development and construction].基于工作记忆理论和项目反应理论的痴呆症神经心理学测试(T-K-W测试):其开发与构建
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2002;104(8):690-709.
10
Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning.对短期记忆及其测量的质疑:为何数字广度测量的是长期联想学习。
Cognition. 2015 Nov;144:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation of improving validity in upper limb measurements for people with tetraplegia using construct specification equations.使用结构规范方程对提高四肢瘫痪患者上肢测量有效性的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98626-4.
2
Measuring a family sense of coherence: a rasch-based study extending dyadic data analyses.测量家庭连贯感:一项基于拉施模型的研究扩展二元数据分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 9;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01639-5.
3
Defining a universal measurement unit and scale for gross motor development.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Recognition Strategy for Epilepsy EEG Signals Based on Conditional Entropy of Ordinal Patterns.一种基于序数模式条件熵的癫痫脑电信号新型识别策略。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 29;22(10):1092. doi: 10.3390/e22101092.
2
Compression in Working Memory and Its Relationship With Fluid Intelligence.工作记忆中的信息压缩及其与流体智力的关系。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 3:904-922. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12601. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
3
The Gothenburg MCI study: Design and distribution of Alzheimer's disease and subcortical vascular disease diagnoses from baseline to 6-year follow-up.
定义粗大运动发育的通用测量单位和量表。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 19;5:1243336. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1243336. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring a New Application of Construct Specification Equations (CSEs) and Entropy: A Pilot Study with Balance Measurements.探索结构规范方程(CSEs)与熵的新应用:一项关于平衡测量的初步研究
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;25(6):940. doi: 10.3390/e25060940.
5
Forward and Backward Recalling Sequences in Spatial and Verbal Memory Tasks: What Do We Measure?空间和言语记忆任务中的正向与反向回忆序列:我们测量的是什么?
Entropy (Basel). 2023 May 18;25(5):813. doi: 10.3390/e25050813.
6
Traceability and comparability through crosswalks with the NeuroMET Memory Metric.通过与 NeuroMET 记忆指标的交叉核对实现可追溯性和可比性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32208-0.
7
The Role of Entropy in Construct Specification Equations (CSE) to Improve the Validity of Memory Tests: Extension to Word Lists.熵在构建规范方程(CSE)以提高记忆测试有效性中的作用:扩展到单词列表
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;24(7):934. doi: 10.3390/e24070934.
8
Entropy in Brain Networks.脑网络中的熵
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;23(9):1157. doi: 10.3390/e23091157.
哥德堡轻度认知障碍研究:从基线到6年随访期内阿尔茨海默病和皮质下血管疾病诊断的设计与分布情况
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016 Jan;36(1):114-31. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.147.
4
The increase of the functional entropy of the human brain with age.人类大脑功能熵随年龄增长而增加。
Sci Rep. 2013 Oct 9;3:2853. doi: 10.1038/srep02853.
5
Causal Rasch models.因果 Rasch 模型。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 23;4:536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00536. eCollection 2013.
6
Putting the Alzheimer's cognitive test to the test II: Rasch Measurement Theory.阿尔茨海默病认知测验的检验 II:Rasch 测量理论。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
Putting the Alzheimer's cognitive test to the test I: traditional psychometric methods.阿尔茨海默病认知测验的检验 I:传统心理计量方法。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
8
The problem with health measurement.健康测量的问题。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:279-90. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14399. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
9
How accurate are lexile text measures?蓝思阅读测评体系文本难度测量的准确性如何?
J Appl Meas. 2006;7(3):307-22.
10
Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences.核苷酸序列上结合位点的信息内容。
J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):415-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90165-8.