Suppr超能文献

蓝思阅读测评体系文本难度测量的准确性如何?

How accurate are lexile text measures?

作者信息

Stenner A Jackson, Burdick Hal, Sanford Eleanor E, Burdick Donald S

机构信息

MetaMetrics, Inc., 1000 Park Forty Plaza Drive, Suite 120, Durham, NC 27713, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2006;7(3):307-22.

Abstract

The Lexile Framework for Reading models comprehension as the difference between a reader measure and a text measure. Uncertainty in comprehension rates results from unreliability in reader measures and inaccuracy in text readability measures. Whole-text processing eliminates sampling error in text measures. However, Lexile text measures are imperfect due to misspecification of the Lexile theory. The standard deviation component associated with theory misspecification is estimated at 64L for a standard-length passage (approximately 125 words). A consequence is that standard errors for longer texts (2,500 to 150,000 words) are measured on the Lexile scale with uncertainties in the single digits. Uncertainties in expected comprehension rates are largely due to imprecision in reader ability and not inaccuracies in text readabilities.

摘要

阅读的Lexile框架将阅读理解模式视为读者指标与文本指标之间的差异。理解率的不确定性源于读者指标的不可靠性和文本可读性指标的不准确。全文处理消除了文本指标中的抽样误差。然而,由于Lexile理论的错误设定,Lexile文本指标并不完美。对于标准长度的段落(约125个单词),与理论错误设定相关的标准差分量估计为64L。结果是,较长文本(2500至150000个单词)的标准误差在Lexile量表上测量时,不确定性在个位数范围内。预期理解率的不确定性主要归因于读者能力的不精确性,而非文本可读性的不准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验