Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic; Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 160 21 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic; ETH Zürich, Animal Physiology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse, 2, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100130. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100130. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
Temporary crating may be a more acceptable housing system for lactating sows than permanent crating from an animal welfare point of view. It remains unclear whether opening the crate leads to changes in sow lying down behaviour and piglet activity that may pose an increased risk of injury to piglets. This study aimed to assess whether the lying down behaviour of lactating sows housed in temporary crating changed shortly after removal of confinement, whether it was influenced by piglets' behaviour and age and whether sows preferentially used some support during lying down after crate opening. Sows (n = 13) were crated from 5 days pre partum to 3 days post partum. Their behaviours were recorded on video over a 24-h period both preceding and following crate opening, as well as over a 24-h period on day 25. The following behaviours were analysed: position and activity of the piglets when the sow lie down, duration of the lying down events, use of pen walls or crate bars as support when lying down; and position of the sow in the pen when lying down. Piglet mortality was assessed every day. Data were analysed in SAS using GLM. The duration of lying down events did not differ between the 24-h periods before and after opening the crate but increased on day 25 (P < 0.01). Similarly, the percentage of piglets in the danger zone did not differ between the 24-h periods before and after opening the crate, but increased on day 25 (P < 0.0001). The percentage of piglets in the creep area increased temporarily the day after the crate opening (P < 0.0001). Sows frequently utilised support when lying down, but less over the 24-h period after the crate opening compared to the two other periods (P < 0.001). A higher percentage of piglets in the creep area resulted in longer lying down events where the sow's snout was in contact with piglets located in the creep area (P < 0.05). The present study shows that opening the crate does have an immediate impact on lying down behaviour and piglet behaviour, but it does not pose an increased risk to piglets. Our results also indicate that piglet behaviour changed with age and influenced sow lying down behaviour. Finally, our findings further suggest that some available lying down support may be a very important feature of the pen during the whole lactation period.
从动物福利的角度来看,临时笼养对于哺乳期母猪可能是一种更可接受的饲养系统,而不是永久性笼养。目前尚不清楚打开笼子是否会导致母猪躺下行为和仔猪活动发生变化,而这些变化可能会增加仔猪受伤的风险。本研究旨在评估哺乳期母猪在被限制后不久被关进临时笼中时的躺下行为是否发生变化,是否受到仔猪行为和年龄的影响,以及母猪在打开笼子后是否更倾向于使用某些支撑物来躺下。母猪(n=13)在产前 5 天至产后 3 天被关进笼子里。在打开笼子之前和之后的 24 小时内,以及第 25 天的 24 小时内,通过视频记录了它们的行为。分析了以下行为:母猪躺下时仔猪的位置和活动、躺下事件的持续时间、母猪躺下时使用围栏墙壁或笼子栏杆作为支撑物的情况;以及母猪在围栏中躺下时的位置。每天评估仔猪死亡率。使用 SAS 中的 GLM 分析数据。打开笼子前后的 24 小时内,躺下事件的持续时间没有差异,但第 25 天增加(P<0.01)。同样,打开笼子前后的 24 小时内,危险区内的仔猪比例没有差异,但第 25 天增加(P<0.0001)。打开笼子后的第二天,爬进区的仔猪比例暂时增加(P<0.0001)。母猪躺下时经常使用支撑物,但打开笼子后的 24 小时内,使用支撑物的次数比其他两个时间段少(P<0.001)。当母猪的鼻子与位于爬进区的仔猪接触时,躺着事件的持续时间会更长,此时爬进区的仔猪比例更高(P<0.05)。本研究表明,打开笼子确实会对母猪的躺下行为和仔猪的行为产生即时影响,但不会对仔猪造成更大的风险。我们的研究结果还表明,仔猪的行为随着年龄的增长而变化,并影响母猪的躺下行为。最后,我们的研究结果进一步表明,在整个哺乳期,一些可用的躺下支撑物可能是围栏的一个非常重要的特征。