Garrard J, Hausman W, Mansfield E, Compton B
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Med Educ. 1988 Jan;22(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00410.x.
Empirical comparisons of priorities of consumers and educators in university-based programmes in psychiatry, psychiatric nursing and social work are described. Data resulted from a Q-sort of 200 objectives for mental health education. The results of the tests of validity and reliability of the instrument are described, followed by a discussion of the similarities and differences among the four samples of subjects: consumers and educators in the three mental health professions. Suggestions for applications of this methodology by inter- and intradisciplinary service providers are described.
本文描述了在大学精神病学、精神科护理和社会工作项目中，对消费者和教育工作者的优先事项进行的实证比较。数据来自对200项心理健康教育目标的Q分类法。文中描述了该工具的效度和信度测试结果，随后讨论了四个样本主体（三个心理健康专业的消费者和教育工作者）之间的异同。文中还描述了跨学科和学科内服务提供者应用该方法的建议。
