Suppr超能文献

来自中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入登记多中心试验的颅内支架内再狭窄长期危险因素

Long-Term Risk Factors for Intracranial In-Stent Restenosis From a Multicenter Trial of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis Registry in China.

作者信息

Guo Xu, Ma Ning, Gao Feng, Mo Da-Peng, Luo Gang, Miao Zhong-Rong

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 26;11:601199. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.601199. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

For patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS), endovascular treatment has been shown to be feasible and safe in recent studies. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) risks the recurrence of ischemic stroke. We attempt to elucidate the risk factors for ISR. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients with sICAS from a prospective registry trial that included 20 centers from September 2013 to January 2015. Cases were classified into the ISR≥ 50% group or the ISR < 50% group. The baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analyses were identified as an association between ISR and endovascular technique factors. According to whether ISR was detected by CT angiography, 97 patients were divided into the ISR group ( = 24) and the non-ISR group ( = 73). The admission baseline features and lesion angiography characteristics were similar, while plasma hs-CRP (mg/L) was higher in the ISR≥ 50% group at admission (8.2 ± 11.4 vs. 2.8 ± 4.1, = 0.032). Binary logistic regression analysis identified the longer stents (adjusted OR 0.816, 95% CI 0.699-0.953; = 0.010), balloon-mounted stents (adjusted OR 5.748, 95% CI 1.533-21.546; = 0.009), and local anesthesia (adjusted OR 6.000, 95% CI 1.693-21.262; = 0.006) as predictors of ISR at the 1-year follow-up. The longer stents, balloon-mounted stents implanted in the intracranial vertebral or basilar artery, and local anesthesia were significantly associated with in-stent restenosis. Further studies are required to identify accurate biomarkers or image markers associated with ISR in ICAS patients. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01968122.

摘要

对于有症状的颅内动脉狭窄(sICAS)患者,近期研究表明血管内治疗是可行且安全的。然而,支架内再狭窄(ISR)会使缺血性中风复发的风险增加。我们试图阐明ISR的危险因素。我们回顾性分析了97例sICAS患者,这些患者来自一项前瞻性注册试验,该试验于2013年9月至2015年1月纳入了20个中心。病例被分为ISR≥50%组或ISR<50%组。比较了两组的基线特征和长期随访情况。二元逻辑回归分析确定了ISR与血管内技术因素之间的关联。根据CT血管造影是否检测到ISR,将97例患者分为ISR组(n = 24)和非ISR组(n = 73)。两组患者入院时的基线特征和病变血管造影特征相似,但ISR≥50%组入院时血浆hs-CRP(mg/L)水平较高(8.2±11.4 vs. 2.8±4.1,P = 0.032)。二元逻辑回归分析确定较长的支架(调整后的OR为0.816,95%CI为0.699 - 0.953;P = 0.010)、球囊扩张式支架(调整后的OR为5.748,95%CI为1.533 - 21.546;P = 0.009)和局部麻醉(调整后的OR为6.000,95%CI为1.693 - 21.262;P = 0.006)是1年随访时ISR的预测因素。较长的支架、植入颅内椎动脉或基底动脉的球囊扩张式支架以及局部麻醉与支架内再狭窄显著相关。需要进一步研究以确定与ICAS患者ISR相关的准确生物标志物或影像标志物。ClinicalTrials.gov网站,标识符:NCT01968122。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a11d/7871004/ef0d5e6557a5/fneur-11-601199-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验