Kurtin Sandra E, Taher Rashida
The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct;11(7):736-751. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.7.7. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Evidenced-based practice requires timely and accurate integration of scientific advances. This presents a challenge for the oncology clinician given the robust pace of scientific discovery and the increasing number of new drug approvals and expanded indications for previously approved drugs. All currently available antineoplastic therapies have been developed through the clinical trials process. Advanced practitioners (APs) in oncology are often involved in the conduct of clinical trials as primary investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, or in the delivery and monitoring of care to patients enrolled in these trials. A prerequisite to evidenced-based practice is understanding how clinical trials are conducted and how to critically analyze published results of studies leading to U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval. Any AP involved in the clinical management and supportive care of patients receiving antineoplastic therapies should be able to critically review published data to glean findings that warrant a change in practice. The goals of this manuscript are to summarize key elements of the clinical trial process for oncology drug development and approval in the United States and to provide a primer for the interpretation of clinical data.
循证医学实践要求及时、准确地整合科学进展。鉴于科学发现的迅猛步伐以及新药物获批数量的不断增加和既往获批药物适应证的扩大,这给肿瘤临床医生带来了挑战。目前所有可用的抗肿瘤治疗方法都是通过临床试验过程研发出来的。肿瘤领域的高级从业者(APs)经常作为主要研究者、副研究者、研究协调员参与临床试验的实施,或参与对这些试验入组患者的护理提供与监测。循证医学实践的一个先决条件是了解临床试验是如何进行的,以及如何批判性地分析那些导致美国食品药品监督管理局批准的研究的已发表结果。任何参与接受抗肿瘤治疗患者临床管理和支持性护理的AP都应该能够批判性地审查已发表的数据,以收集值得改变实践的研究结果。本文的目的是总结美国肿瘤药物研发和批准的临床试验过程的关键要素,并提供一份临床数据解读入门指南。