Hanna Magdi, Montero Antonio, Perrot Serge, Varrassi Giustino
Analgesics and Pain Research (APR) Ltd, Beckenham, UK.
Department of Anaesthesiology Pain Treatment and Critical Care, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):485-503. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00228-7. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Recently the DAVID study demonstrated the better analgesic efficacy of tramadol hydrochloride/dexketoprofen 75/25 mg (TRAM/DKP) over tramadol hydrochloride/paracetamol 75/650 mg (TRAM/paracetamol) in a model of moderate to severe acute pain following surgical removal of an impacted third molar. The aim of this subpopulation analysis was to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between baseline pain intensity (PI) level and the effectiveness in pain control of the TRAM/DKP combination in comparison with the TRAM/paracetamol combination. This will further improve and facilitate the accurate design of future acute pain studies for the use of the TRAM/DKP combination.
Patients experiencing at least moderate pain, defined as a PI score ≥ 4 in an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) were stratified according to NRS-PI at baseline (NRS ≥ 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8) or aggregated in two groups: (i) moderate pain, NRS-PI ≥ 4 to ≤ 6; (ii) severe pain, NRS-PI > 6. Analgesic efficacy was assessed at pre-specified time points by using pain relief (PAR) on a 5-point verbal rating scale (VRS) and PI on an 11-point NRS. The primary endpoint was total PAR over 6 h post-dose (TOTPAR6); secondary endpoints included, among others, the time course of mean PAR and PI scores over 8 h, TOTPAR over 2, 4, and 8 h post-dose, and the sum of PI difference (SPID) over 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. Safety evaluation was based on the incidence, seriousness, intensity, and causal relationship of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
The analgesic efficacy evaluated by TOTPAR6 (primary endpoint) remained steady across increasing baseline PI-NRS cutoff groups with TRAM/DKP, but not with TRAM/paracetamol. The study also demonstrated the superiority of TRAM/DKP combination over TRAM/paracetamol in terms of TOTPAR over 2, 4, and 8 h post-dose and SPID at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h post-dose in both baseline PI groups (moderate or severe); similarly, the time course of PAR and PI indicated better efficacy with TRAM/DKP as soon as 30 min and up to 4-6 h. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was not increased in the severe baseline PI group.
Overall, the results of this subgroup analysis of the DAVID study confirmed the superiority of the analgesic efficacy of TRAM/DKP vs TRAM/paracetamol, irrespective of the baseline PI.
最近,DAVID研究表明,在拔除阻生第三磨牙后的中重度急性疼痛模型中,盐酸曲马多/右酮洛芬75/25毫克(TRAM/DKP)的镇痛效果优于盐酸曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚75/650毫克(TRAM/对乙酰氨基酚)。本亚组分析的目的是更深入地了解基线疼痛强度(PI)水平与TRAM/DKP组合与TRAM/对乙酰氨基酚组合在疼痛控制有效性之间的关系。这将进一步改进并有助于准确设计未来使用TRAM/DKP组合的急性疼痛研究。
将经历至少中度疼痛(定义为11点数字评分量表(NRS)中PI评分≥4)的患者根据基线时的NRS-PI进行分层(NRS≥4、5、6、7或8),或分为两组:(i)中度疼痛,NRS-PI≥4至≤6;(ii)重度疼痛,NRS-PI>6。在预先指定的时间点,使用5点言语评分量表(VRS)上的疼痛缓解(PAR)和11点NRS上的PI来评估镇痛效果。主要终点是给药后6小时内的总PAR(TOTPAR6);次要终点包括给药后8小时内平均PAR和PI评分的时间过程、给药后2、4和8小时的TOTPAR,以及给药后2、4、6和8小时的PI差异总和(SPID)。安全性评估基于治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率、严重程度、强度和因果关系。
TRAM/DKP的TOTPAR6(主要终点)评估的镇痛效果在基线PI-NRS临界值增加的组中保持稳定,但TRAM/对乙酰氨基酚则不然。该研究还表明,在两个基线PI组(中度或重度)中,TRAM/DKP组合在给药后2、4和8小时的TOTPAR以及给药后2、4、6和8小时的SPID方面优于TRAM/对乙酰氨基酚;同样,PAR和PI的时间过程表明,TRAM/DKP在30分钟后至4-6小时内疗效更好。严重基线PI组中药物不良反应的发生率没有增加。
总体而言,DAVID研究的该亚组分析结果证实了TRAM/DKP与TRAM/对乙酰氨基酚相比在镇痛效果上的优越性,与基线PI无关。