Suppr超能文献

在急诊科分诊区给予鼻内舒芬太尼治疗严重急性创伤性疼痛:一项随机双盲对照试验。

Intranasal sufentanil given in the emergency department triage zone for severe acute traumatic pain: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 30 voie Romaine, Nice, 06000, France.

School of Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-02014-y. Epub 2019 Jan 1.

Abstract

The goal of our study was to determine if an intranasal (IN) dose of sufentanil delivered in the ED triage zone would improve the management of severely painful patients. We performed a randomized, double blind and placebo-controlled trial on adult patients suffering from an acute severe pain (≥ 6/10) consecutive to an isolated limb injury. We compared 2 analgesic strategies: the usual pain treatment with IV-only multimodal analgesics (IVMA) including IV opioids if needed (control group) and another strategy (active group) based on a single dose of IN sufentanil (0.4 μg/kg) given at triage and followed by IV multimodal analgesia. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching pain-relief (≤ 3/10) 30 min after IN injection at triage. Secondary outcomes were rates of adverse events, frequency of clinical interventions required by these events, and satisfaction of patients. A total of 144 adult participants completed the study, 72 in each group. Compared with usual IV-only pain management, the analgesic strategy initiated in triage zone with a dose of IN sufentanil increased the proportion of patients reaching pain relief in 30 min: 72.2% versus 51.4%, in our trial (p = 0.01 and number needed to treat of 5). There was no serious adverse event (AE) in both groups. Patients who received IN sufentanil experienced more frequently minor opiate side effects. Proportion of respiratory AEs was higher in the active group (12.5% of bradypnea < 10 cycles per minute versus 1.4%) but these events were of mild severity, as only 2 participants (one in each group) received temporary low dose oxygen therapy, and none required naloxone. Lengths of stay in the ED were similar in both groups, as well as satisfaction of patients (above 9/10) and pain scores at discharge (< 2/10). We found that a single dose of IN sufentanil delivered in the ED triage zone significantly increases the proportion of severely painful patients reaching painrelief in 30 min, compared to usual analgesia with IV-only multimodal analgesia.

摘要

我们的研究目的是确定在急诊分诊区给予经鼻(IN)舒芬太尼是否会改善严重疼痛患者的治疗。我们对因孤立性肢体损伤而连续出现急性严重疼痛(≥ 6/10)的成年患者进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。我们比较了两种镇痛策略:仅静脉(IV)多模式镇痛(IVMA)的常规疼痛治疗,包括需要时的 IV 阿片类药物(对照组)和另一种策略(主动组),即在分诊时给予单次 IN 舒芬太尼(0.4μg/kg),然后进行 IV 多模式镇痛。我们的主要结局是在分诊时 IN 注射后 30 分钟达到疼痛缓解(≤ 3/10)的患者比例。次要结局是不良事件的发生率、这些事件所需的临床干预的频率以及患者的满意度。共有 144 名成年参与者完成了这项研究,每组 72 人。与常规 IV 单药止痛管理相比,在分诊区使用 IN 舒芬太尼进行的镇痛策略增加了在 30 分钟内达到疼痛缓解的患者比例:在我们的试验中,72.2%对 51.4%(p=0.01,需要治疗的人数为 5)。两组均无严重不良事件(AE)。接受 IN 舒芬太尼的患者更频繁地出现轻微阿片类药物副作用。主动组呼吸不良事件的比例较高(12.5%的呼吸频率减慢<10 次/分钟,而 1.4%),但这些事件的严重程度较轻,只有 2 名参与者(每组各 1 名)接受了临时低剂量吸氧治疗,且均无需纳洛酮。两组患者在急诊留观时间和患者满意度(均>9/10)和出院时疼痛评分(<2/10)均相似。我们发现,与仅 IV 多模式镇痛相比,在急诊分诊区给予单次 IN 舒芬太尼可显著增加在 30 分钟内达到疼痛缓解的严重疼痛患者的比例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验