• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内皮素受体拮抗剂与磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂治疗系统性硬化症手指溃疡的临床比较。

A clinical comparison of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for treating digital ulcers of systemic sclerosis.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5814-5819. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab147.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keab147
PMID:33576774
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase type5 inhibitors (PDE5is) for treating SSc-related digital ulcers (DUs).

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study recruited patients with active SSc-related DUs from 13 medical centres in South Korea. The primary outcome was time to cardinal ulcer (CU) healing. A secondary outcome was time to new DU occurrence. Patients were followed up 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were analysed. Their mean age was 49.9 years (s.d. 11.4) and 49 were female. Twenty-eight had limited SSc. Forty-nine patients received ERA, 11 received a PDE5i (9 sildenafil, 1 udenafil and 1 tadalafil) and 3 received other medication. The hazard ratio (HR) for time to CU healing in the ERA group vs the PDE5i group was 0.75 (95% CI 0.35, 1.64; P = 0.47) in an unadjusted model and 0.80 (95% CI 0.36, 1.78; P = 0.59) in a model adjusted for age, sex, use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), total DU number and initial CU area. The HR for new DU development in the ERA group vs the PDE5i group was 0.39 (95% CI 0.16, 0.93; P = 0.03) in an unadjusted model and 0.32 (95% CI 0.13, 0.81; P = 0.02) in an adjusted model. No patients receiving CCBs developed new DUs at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Time to CU healing is comparable for ERA and PDE5i. ERAs are more effective in reducing new DU occurrence than PDE5is. CCBs may be effective as a background medication.

摘要

目的

评估内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)和磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂(PDE5i)治疗系统性硬化症相关手指溃疡(DU)的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究,在韩国的 13 家医疗中心招募了患有活动期系统性硬化症相关 DU 的患者。主要结局是主要溃疡(CU)愈合时间。次要结局是新 DU 发生时间。患者在治疗开始后 4、8、12 和 24 周进行随访。

结果

共分析了 63 例患者,其平均年龄为 49.9 岁(标准差 11.4),49 例为女性,28 例为局限型系统性硬化症。49 例患者接受 ERA 治疗,11 例接受 PDE5i(9 例西地那非、1 例乌地那非和 1 例他达拉非)治疗,3 例接受其他药物治疗。在未调整模型中,ERA 组与 PDE5i 组 CU 愈合时间的风险比(HR)为 0.75(95%CI 0.35, 1.64;P=0.47),在调整年龄、性别、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)使用、总 DU 数量和初始 CU 面积后,HR 为 0.80(95%CI 0.36, 1.78;P=0.59)。在未调整模型中,ERA 组与 PDE5i 组新 DU 发生率的 HR 为 0.39(95%CI 0.16, 0.93;P=0.03),在调整模型中,HR 为 0.32(95%CI 0.13, 0.81;P=0.02)。在 24 周时,未使用 CCB 的患者均未出现新的 DU。

结论

ERA 和 PDE5i 治疗 CU 愈合时间相当,ERA 在减少新 DU 发生方面比 PDE5i 更有效。CCB 可能是一种有效的背景治疗药物。

相似文献

1
A clinical comparison of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for treating digital ulcers of systemic sclerosis.内皮素受体拮抗剂与磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂治疗系统性硬化症手指溃疡的临床比较。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5814-5819. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab147.
2
The incidence rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension and scleroderma renal crisis in systemic sclerosis patients with digital ulcers on endothelin antagonist receptors (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i).系统性硬皮病患者出现指端溃疡时,内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)和磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(PDE5i)的肺动脉高压和硬皮病肾危象发生率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Feb 1;60(2):872-880. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa401.
3
Use of vasoactive/vasodilating drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related digital ulcers (DUs) in expert tertiary centres: results from the analysis of the observational real-life DeSScipher study.在专家级三级中心使用血管活性/血管扩张药物治疗系统性硬化症(SSc)相关的手指溃疡(DUs):来自观察性真实世界 DeSScipher 研究的分析结果。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;39(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04564-8. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.波生坦治疗系统性硬化症相关的手指溃疡:RAPIDS-2 随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):32-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.130658. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
5
Non-healing ischaemic digital ulcer in a systemic sclerosis patient: a challenging clinical case.系统性硬化症患者的难愈合缺血性指端溃疡:一个具有挑战性的临床病例。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):978-981. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12742. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Detection of severe digital vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis by colour Doppler sonography is associated with digital ulcers.通过彩色多普勒超声检测系统性硬化症中的严重指端血管病变与指端溃疡相关。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):1865-1873. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex045.
7
Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症中的指端溃疡
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jan;56(1):14-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew047. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Efficacy of sildenafil on ischaemic digital ulcer healing in systemic sclerosis: the placebo-controlled SEDUCE study.西地那非对系统性硬化症缺血性指端溃疡愈合的疗效:安慰剂对照的SEDUCE研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):1009-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207001. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
Use of bosentan for digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: a real-life retrospective French study of 89 patients treated since specific approval.波生坦用于治疗系统性硬化症相关指端溃疡:一项针对自获批以来接受治疗的89例患者的法国真实病例回顾性研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(5):398-402. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2014.887768. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
[Treatment of digital ulcers in systemtic sclerosis with endothelin-1 receptor antagonist (bosentan)].用内皮素-1受体拮抗剂(波生坦)治疗系统性硬化症中的指端溃疡
Reumatismo. 2007 Apr-Jun;59(2):135-9. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2007.135.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis in Korea.韩国系统性硬化症的流行病学与治疗
J Rheum Dis. 2022 Oct 1;29(4):200-214. doi: 10.4078/jrd.22.0029.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review.系统性硬皮病患者的系统性药理学治疗:系统文献回顾。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3785-3800. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead289.