Prospective study to compare axial position stability after fellow-eye implantation of 2 distinct intraocular lens designs.

PURPOSE

To compare the dynamics of axial intraocular lens (IOL) position and stability in the capsular bag after fellow-eye implantation of a 1-piece C-loop and a 4-point haptic IOL.

SETTING

Hanusch Hospital, Vienna.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative, randomized bilateral study.

METHODS

One hundred eyes of 50 patients were randomly implanted with a C-loop IOL (CT LUCIA 611P) in 1 eye and a 4-point haptic IOL (CT ASPHINA 409MP) in the other eye. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured at 1 week (W1), 1 month (M1), and 4 to 6 months (M4-6) postoperatively using a swept-source optical coherence tomography device (IOLMaster 700). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity, and subjective refraction outcomes were assessed at M4-6 postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

Hundred eyes of 50 patient were included. Pseudophakia ACD values at W1, M1, and M4-6 timepoints were significantly different in eyes implanted with the C-loop IOL compared with the 4-point haptic IOL (P < .001). The overall IOL shift was 0.25 ± 0.16 mm for the 4-point haptic IOL and 0.14 ± 0.09 mm for the C-loop IOL (P < .001). The M4-6 mean monocular UDVA outcome for eyes with C-loop IOL was 0.06 ± 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and 0.03 ± 0.10 logMAR for the eyes with 4-point haptic IOL. M4-6 mean spherical equivalent was -0.32 ± 0.48 diopter (D) in the C-loop IOL group and -0.33 ± 0.42 D in the 4-point haptic IOL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant differences in IOL design results in different postoperative ACD values. No relevant or statistically significant differences were found in refraction or visual acuity between the groups.