Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Grupo de Pesquisa de Intervenções Em Nutrição, 190 Alfredo Balena Avenue, Nursing School, Room 316, Santa Efigênia, 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Nutrição, Departamento de Nutrição Clínica e Social, Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Saúde e Nutrição, Grupo de Pesquisa de Intervenções Em Nutrição, Dois Street, Morro Do Cruzeiro Campus, Nutrition School, Room 65, 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105159. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105159. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
Interventions based on the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) are usually effective at increasing fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, but it is not known whether individuals with misperceived intake [e.g., in pseudomaintenance (PM)] for FV intake also benefit from these interventions. This study aims to describe the effectiveness of a TTM-based intervention for FV intake according to baseline perception of intake adequacy. A randomized controlled community trial was carried out with 3414 users of a health promotion service in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, aged 20 years or over, in 2013-2014. FV intake was estimated using a validated instrument. PM was identified when participants had insufficient FV intake and thought their intake was adequate. The intervention group (IG) received a TTM-based intervention, and the control group (CG) received usual care. Baseline FV intakes were lower among individuals in PM compared to those with a concordant perception (CP). In both the IG and CG, FV intake increased among those in PM. Fruit intake remained stable, and vegetable intake decreased among those with CP. Generalized estimating equations revealed a significant effect of the intervention on fruit intake at follow-up, which was slightly higher among those in PM. We conclude that participants in PM were partially sensitive to the intervention and improved fruit intake at follow-up. We suggest that future studies emphasize vegetable intake and elucidate how TTM pillars (self-efficacy, decisional balance, processes of change) can be best used to increase FV intake.
基于跨理论模型(TTM)的干预措施通常能有效增加水果和蔬菜(FV)的摄入量,但尚不清楚是否摄入感知错误(例如,在伪维持(PM)中)的个体也能从这些干预措施中受益。本研究旨在根据摄入充足性的基线感知,描述基于 TTM 的 FV 摄入干预措施的有效性。2013-2014 年,在巴西贝洛奥里藏特的一项健康促进服务的 3414 名用户中开展了一项随机对照社区试验,年龄在 20 岁及以上。使用经过验证的工具估计 FV 的摄入量。当参与者 FV 摄入量不足但认为摄入量充足时,就会确定 PM。干预组(IG)接受 TTM 为基础的干预,对照组(CG)接受常规护理。与具有一致性感知的个体相比,PM 个体的基线 FV 摄入量较低。在 IG 和 CG 中,PM 个体的 FV 摄入量均增加。水果摄入量保持稳定,CP 个体的蔬菜摄入量下降。广义估计方程显示,干预措施对随访时的水果摄入量有显著影响,PM 个体的影响略高。我们得出结论,PM 个体对干预措施有一定的敏感性,并在随访时改善了水果摄入量。我们建议未来的研究强调蔬菜摄入量,并阐明 TTM 支柱(自我效能、决策平衡、变化过程)如何最好地用于增加 FV 摄入量。