Miall R Christopher, Afanasyeva Daria, Cole Jonathan D, Mason Peggy
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Centre of Postgraduate Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Apr;239(4):1203-1221. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06037-4. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
The degree to which mental representations of the body can be established and maintained without somatosensory input remains unclear. We contrast two "deafferented" adults, one who acquired large fibre sensory loss as an adult (IW) and another who was born without somatosensation (KS). We compared their responses to those of matched controls in three perceptual tasks: first accuracy of their mental image of their hands (assessed by testing recognition of correct hand length/width ratio in distorted photographs and by locating landmarks on the unseen hand); then accuracy of arm length judgements (assessed by judgement of reaching distance), and finally, we tested for an attentional bias towards peri-personal space (assessed by reaction times to visual target presentation). We hypothesised that IW would demonstrate responses consistent with him accessing conscious knowledge, whereas KS might show evidence of responses dependent on non-conscious mechanisms. In the first two experiments, both participants were able to give consistent responses about hand shape and arm length, but IW displayed a better awareness of hand shape than KS (and controls). KS demonstrated poorer spatial accuracy in reporting hand landmarks than both IW and controls, and appears to have less awareness of her hands. Reach distance was overestimated by both IW and KS, as it was for controls; the precision of their judgements was slightly lower than that of the controls. In the attentional task, IW showed no reaction time differences across conditions in the visual detection task, unlike controls, suggesting that he has no peri-personal bias of attention. In contrast, KS did show target location-dependent modulation of reaction times, when her hands were visible. We suggest that both IW and KS can access a conscious body image, although its accuracy may reflect their different experience of hand action. Acquired sensory loss has deprived IW of any subconscious body awareness, but the congenital absence of somatosensation may have led to its partial replacement by a form of visual proprioception in KS.
在没有躯体感觉输入的情况下,身体的心理表征能够建立和维持的程度仍不明确。我们对比了两名“去传入神经”的成年人,一名成年后获得了大纤维感觉丧失(IW),另一名生来就没有躯体感觉(KS)。我们在三项感知任务中比较了他们与匹配对照组的反应:首先是他们对手部心理图像的准确性(通过测试对扭曲照片中正确手长/宽比例的识别以及在看不见的手上定位地标来评估);然后是手臂长度判断的准确性(通过对伸手距离的判断来评估),最后,我们测试了对个人周边空间的注意力偏向(通过对视觉目标呈现的反应时间来评估)。我们假设IW会表现出与他获取意识知识相一致的反应,而KS可能会显示出依赖于无意识机制的反应证据。在前两个实验中,两名参与者都能够对手部形状和手臂长度给出一致的反应,但IW对手部形状的意识比KS(以及对照组)更好。KS在报告手部地标时的空间准确性比IW和对照组都差,并且似乎对自己的手缺乏意识。IW和KS都高估了伸手距离,对照组也是如此;他们判断的精度略低于对照组。在注意力任务中,与对照组不同,IW在视觉检测任务的不同条件下没有表现出反应时间差异,这表明他没有个人周边注意力偏向。相比之下,当KS的手可见时,她确实表现出反应时间的目标位置依赖性调制。我们认为IW和KS都能够获得有意识的身体图像,尽管其准确性可能反映了他们对手部动作的不同体验。后天性感觉丧失使IW失去了任何潜意识的身体意识,但先天性缺乏躯体感觉可能导致KS中这种意识被一种视觉本体感觉形式部分替代。