Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 May;36(5):479-496. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00725-9. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2019. For all exposures other than night and shift work and long working hours, we limited our selection of studies to those with a longitudinal design. We extracted available risk estimates for each of 19 psychosocial exposures, from which we calculated summary risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019130266). 54 studies were included, addressing 19 exposures and 11 different measures of depression. Only data on depressive episodes were sufficient for evaluation. Heterogeneity of exposure definitions and ascertainment, outcome measures, risk parameterization and effect contrasts limited the validity of meta-analyses. Summary risk estimates were above unity for all but one exposure, and below 1.60 for all but another. Outcome measures were liable to high rates of false positives, control of relevant confounding was mostly inadequate, and common method bias was likely in a large proportion of studies. The combination of resulting biases is likely to have inflated observed effect estimates. When statistical uncertainties and the potential for bias and confounding are taken into account, it is not possible to conclude with confidence that any of the psychosocial exposures at work included in this review is either likely or unlikely to cause depressive episodes or recurrent depressive disorders.
在过去的十年中,许多研究都考察了不良心理社会工作环境与抑郁症之间的关联。我们旨在评估工作中的心理社会因素与抑郁障碍之间是否存在因果关系的证据。我们从 1980 年到 2019 年 3 月进行了系统的文献检索。对于除夜班和轮班工作以及工作时间长以外的所有暴露因素,我们将研究选择仅限于具有纵向设计的研究。我们从每个 19 种心理社会暴露因素中提取了可用的风险估计值,并从这些风险估计值中计算了具有 95%置信区间的汇总风险估计值(PROSPERO,标识符 CRD42019130266)。共纳入了 54 项研究,涉及 19 种暴露因素和 11 种不同的抑郁测量方法。只有关于抑郁发作的数据才足以进行评估。暴露定义和确定、结果测量、风险参数化和效应对比的异质性限制了荟萃分析的有效性。除了一个暴露因素外,所有暴露因素的汇总风险估计值均大于 1,除了另一个暴露因素外,所有暴露因素的汇总风险估计值均小于 1.60。结果测量容易出现假阳性,对相关混杂因素的控制大多不足,并且在很大一部分研究中可能存在共同方法偏差。由此产生的偏差的组合可能会夸大观察到的效应估计值。当考虑到统计不确定性以及偏倚和混杂的可能性时,我们无法有把握地得出结论,认为本综述中包括的任何工作中的心理社会暴露因素都很可能或不太可能导致抑郁发作或复发性抑郁障碍。