University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA), Healthy Ageing Research Consortium, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Apr 13;76(5):1339-1348. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab007.
To examine national variation in systemic antibiotic use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and identify facility characteristics associated with antibiotic utilization.
This retrospective cohort study included 312 375 residents of 2536 Australian LTCFs between 2011 and 2016. LTCFs were categorized as low, medium or high antibiotic use facilities according to tertiles of DDDs of systemic antibiotics dispensed per 1000 resident-days. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the associations between facility characteristics (ownership, size, location, medication quality indicator performance, prevalence of after-hours medical practitioner services) and antibiotic use (low versus high).
LTCFs in the lowest and highest antibiotic use categories received a median of 54.3 (IQR 46.5-60.5) and 106.1 (IQR 95.9-122.3) DDDs/1000 resident-days, respectively. Compared with not-for-profit LTCFs in major cities, government-owned non-metropolitan LTCFs were less likely to experience high antibiotic use [adjusted OR (aOR) 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.91]. LTCFs with 69-99 residents were less likely to experience high antibiotic use (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97) than those with 25-47 residents annually. Greater prevalence of medical practitioner services accessed after-hours was associated with high antibiotic use [aOR 1.10 (per 10% increase in after-hours services), 95% CI 1.01-1.21]. South Australian LTCFs (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.38-3.39) were more likely, while Queensland (0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.62) and Western Australian (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.57) LTCFs were less likely to experience high antibiotic use than New South Wales LTCFs.
Considerable facility level variation in systemic antibiotic use was observed across Australian LTCFs. Identification of facility characteristics associated with antibiotic use provides a basis for targeted stewardship initiatives.
调查长期护理机构(LTCF)中全身用抗生素的国家差异,并确定与抗生素使用相关的设施特征。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2011 年至 2016 年期间澳大利亚 2536 家 LTCF 中 312375 名居民。根据全身用抗生素的日剂量消耗限定日剂量(DDD)的三分位值,将 LTCF 分为低、中、高抗生素使用组。多变量逻辑回归估计了设施特征(所有权、规模、位置、药物质量指标表现、夜间医生服务的流行程度)与抗生素使用(低 vs 高)之间的关联。
最低和最高抗生素使用组别的 LTCF 分别接受了中位数为 54.3(IQR 46.5-60.5)和 106.1(IQR 95.9-122.3)DDD/1000 居民日。与主要城市的非营利性 LTCF 相比,政府所有的非大都市 LTCF 不太可能出现高抗生素使用[调整后的比值比(aOR)0.47,95%置信区间(CI)0.24-0.91]。每年居民人数为 69-99 人的 LTCF 比居民人数为 25-47 人的 LTCF 不太可能出现高抗生素使用(aOR 0.69,95%CI 0.49-0.97)。夜间医生服务的高流行率与高抗生素使用相关[aOR 1.10(每增加 10%的夜间服务),95%CI 1.01-1.21]。南澳大利亚的 LTCF(aOR 2.17,95%CI 1.38-3.39)更有可能,而昆士兰(0.43,95%CI 0.30-0.62)和西澳大利亚(aOR 0.34,95%CI 0.21-0.57)的 LTCF 比新南威尔士州的 LTCF 更不可能出现高抗生素使用。
在澳大利亚的 LTCF 中观察到全身用抗生素的使用存在相当大的设施水平差异。确定与抗生素使用相关的设施特征为有针对性的管理举措提供了依据。