Gadke Daniel L, Kratochwill Thomas R, Gettinger Maribeth
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, United States.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Feb;84:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
In this paper, we review some dimensions of feasibility research. Feasibility research focuses on the intervention process and addresses questions about whether and how an intervention can be evaluated and implemented. Feasibility studies are implemented prior to conducting an outcome-focused pilot study or full-scale evaluation to test the effectiveness of an intervention. We propose a feasibility framework that includes 10 possible dimensions to evaluate in a feasibility trial, including (a) recruitment capability, (b) data collection procedures, (c) design procedures, (d) social validity, (e) practicality, (f) integration into existing systems, (g) adaptability, (h) implementation, (i) effectiveness, and (j) generalizability. Among these dimensions we offer some priorities that researchers can consider in establishing feasibility. Although feasibility investigations can advance evidence-based practice in psychology and education, we review current challenges for researchers to consider when incorporating a feasibility protocol into their intervention research agenda.
在本文中,我们回顾了可行性研究的一些方面。可行性研究聚焦于干预过程,并解决关于一项干预措施能否以及如何进行评估和实施的问题。可行性研究在开展以结果为导向的试点研究或全面评估以测试干预措施的有效性之前进行。我们提出了一个可行性框架,其中包括在可行性试验中可评估的10个可能方面,包括:(a) 招募能力,(b) 数据收集程序,(c) 设计程序,(d) 社会效度,(e) 实用性,(f) 融入现有系统,(g) 适应性,(h) 实施,(i) 有效性,以及(j) 普遍性。在这些方面中,我们提供了一些研究人员在确定可行性时可以考虑的优先事项。尽管可行性调查可以推动心理学和教育领域基于证据的实践,但我们回顾了研究人员在将可行性方案纳入其干预研究议程时需要考虑的当前挑战。