Suppr超能文献

有和无心血管疾病史的 2 型糖尿病患者的处方:英国 CPRD 的描述性分析。

Prescribing in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With and Without Cardiovascular Disease History: A Descriptive Analysis in the UK CPRD.

机构信息

Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, United Kingdom.

Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):320-335. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Some classes of glucose-lowering medications, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have cardio-protective benefit, but it is unclear whether this influences prescribing in the United Kingdom (UK). This study aims to describe class-level prescribing in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by cardiovascular disease (CVD) history using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

METHODS

Four cross-sections of people with T2DM aged 18-90 and registered with their general practice for >1 year on 1st January 2017 (n = 166,012), 1st January 2018 (n = 155,290), 1st January 2019 (n = 152,602) and 31st December 2019 (n = 143,373) were identified. Age-standardised proportions for class use through time were calculated separately in those with and without CVD history and by total number of medications prescribed (one, two, three, four+). An analysis by UK country was also performed.

FINDINGS

Around 31% of patients had CVD history at each cross-section. Metformin was the most common treatment (>70% of those with and without CVD had prescriptions across all treatment lines). Overall use of SGLT2is and GLP1-RAs was low, with slightly less use in patients with CVD (SGLT2i: 9.8% and 13.8% in those with and without CVD respectively; GLP1-RA: 4.3% and 4.9%, December 2019). Use of SGLT2is as part of dual therapy was low but rose throughout the study. In January 2017, estimated use was 8.0% (95% CI 6.9-9.1%) and 8.9% (8.6-9.3%) in those with and without CVD. By December 2019 this reached 18.3% (17.0-19.5%) and 21.2% (20.6-21.7%) for those with and without CVD respectively. SGLT2i use as triple therapy increased: 22.7% (21.0-24.4%) and 25.9% (25.2-26.6%) in January 2017 to 41.3% (39.5-43.0%) and 45.5% (44.7-46.3%) in December 2019. GLP1-RA use also increased, but observed usage remained lower than SGLT2 inhibitors. Insulin use remained stable throughout, with higher use observed in those with CVD (16% vs 9.7% Dec 2019). Time trends in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were similar, although class prevalence varied.

IMPLICATIONS

Although use of SGLT2is and GLP1-RAs has increased, overall usage remains low with slightly lower use in those with CVD history, suggesting there is opportunity to optimise use of these medicines in T2DM patients to manage CVD risk. Insulin use was substantially more prevalent in those with CVD despite no evidence of CVD benefit. Further investigation of factors influencing this finding may highlight strategies to improve patient access to the most appropriate treatments, including those with evidence of cardiovascular benefit.

摘要

目的

包括钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2is)和胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)在内的一些降糖药物具有心脏保护益处,但尚不清楚这是否会影响英国(UK)的处方。本研究旨在使用临床实践研究数据库(CPRD),根据心血管疾病(CVD)史描述成年人 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的分类处方。

方法

2017 年 1 月 1 日(n = 166,012)、2018 年 1 月 1 日(n = 155,290)、2019 年 1 月 1 日(n = 152,602)和 2019 年 12 月 31 日(n = 143,373),分别有 18-90 岁且在其普通诊所注册超过 1 年的 4 个时间点的 T2DM 患者。分别在有和没有 CVD 病史的患者中按时间计算不同治疗线的类药物使用率的年龄标准化比例,并按开具的药物总数(1、2、3、4+)进行分析。还对英国各地区进行了分析。

结果

在每个时间点,约 31%的患者有 CVD 病史。二甲双胍是最常用的治疗方法(>70%有和没有 CVD 的患者在所有治疗线均有处方)。SGLT2is 和 GLP1-RAs 的总体使用率较低,在有 CVD 病史的患者中使用率略低(SGLT2i:分别为 9.8%和 13.8%;GLP1-RA:分别为 4.3%和 4.9%,2019 年 12 月)。SGLT2is 作为双联疗法的一部分使用较少,但整个研究期间有所增加。2017 年 1 月,估计使用率分别为 8.0%(95%CI 6.9-9.1%)和 8.9%(8.6-9.3%),在有和没有 CVD 的患者中。到 2019 年 12 月,这一比例分别达到 18.3%(17.0-19.5%)和 21.2%(20.6-21.7%),有和没有 CVD 的患者分别为 25.9%(25.2-26.6%)。SGLT2i 作为三联疗法的使用增加:2017 年 1 月为 22.7%(21.0-24.4%),到 2019 年 12 月为 41.3%(39.5-43.0%)。GLP1-RA 的使用也有所增加,但观察到的使用率仍然低于 SGLT2 抑制剂。胰岛素的使用一直保持稳定,在有 CVD 的患者中使用较多(2019 年 12 月为 16%,而 9.7%)。英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的时间趋势相似,尽管分类流行率有所不同。

结论

尽管 SGLT2is 和 GLP1-RAs 的使用有所增加,但总体使用率仍然较低,在有 CVD 病史的患者中使用率略低,这表明在 T2DM 患者中优化这些药物的使用以管理 CVD 风险仍有机会。尽管没有证据表明对 CVD 有益,但在有 CVD 的患者中,胰岛素的使用明显更为普遍。进一步调查影响这一发现的因素可能会突出改善患者获得最适当治疗的策略,包括那些具有心血管益处的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验