Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb 14;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01742-0.
Social insects vary widely in social organization, yet the genetical and ecological factors influencing this variation remain poorly known. In particular, whether spatially varying selection influences the maintenance of social polymorphisms in ants has been rarely investigated. To fill this gap, we examined whether fine-scale habitat heterogeneity contributes to the co-existence of alternative forms of social organization within populations. Single-queen colonies (monogyne social form) are generally associated with better colonization abilities, whereas multiple-queen colonies (polygyne social form) are predicted to be better competitors and monopolize saturated habitats. We hypothesize that each social form colonizes and thrives in distinct local habitats, as a result of their alternative dispersal and colony founding strategies. Here, we test this hypothesis in the Alpine silver ant, in which a supergene controls polymorphic social organization.
Monogyne and polygyne colonies predominate in distinct habitats of the same population. The analysis of 59 sampling plots distributed across six habitats revealed that single-queen colonies mostly occupy unconnected habitats that were most likely reached by flight. This includes young habitats isolated by water and old habitats isolated by vegetation. In contrast, multiple-queen colonies were abundant in young, continuous and saturated habitats. Hence, alternative social forms colonize and monopolize distinct niches at a very local scale.
Alternative social forms colonized and monopolized different local habitats, in accordance with differences in colonization and competition abilities. The monogyne social form displays a colonizer phenotype, by efficiently occupying empty habitats, while the polygyne social form exhibits a competitor phenotype, thriving in saturated habitats. The combination of the two phenotypes, coupled with fine-scale habitat heterogeneity, may allow the coexistence of alternative social forms within populations. Overall, these results suggest that spatially varying selection may be one of the mechanisms contributing to the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms in social organization.
社会昆虫在社会组织方面差异很大,但影响这种变化的遗传和生态因素仍知之甚少。特别是,空间变化的选择是否会影响蚂蚁社会多态性的维持,这一点很少被研究。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了细粒度的生境异质性是否有助于群体内替代形式的社会组织共存。单后蚁群(单态社会形式)通常与更好的殖民能力相关,而多后蚁群(多态社会形式)则被预测为更好的竞争者,并垄断饱和的栖息地。我们假设,由于它们不同的扩散和蚁群建立策略,每种社会形式都会在不同的局部栖息地中殖民和茁壮成长。在这里,我们在高山银蚁中检验了这一假设,在这种蚂蚁中,一个超级基因控制着多态性的社会组织。
单后蚁群和多后蚁群在同一群体的不同栖息地中占主导地位。对分布在六个栖息地的 59 个采样点的分析表明,单后蚁群主要占据未连接的栖息地,这些栖息地最有可能通过飞行到达。这包括被水和植被隔开的年轻栖息地。相比之下,多后蚁群在年轻、连续和饱和的栖息地中数量丰富。因此,替代的社会形式在非常局部的尺度上占据和垄断不同的生态位。
替代的社会形式在不同的局部栖息地中进行殖民和垄断,这与殖民和竞争能力的差异有关。单后蚁群表现出一种殖民者的表型,有效地占据了空旷的栖息地,而多后蚁群表现出一种竞争者的表型,在饱和的栖息地中茁壮成长。这两种表型的结合,加上细粒度的生境异质性,可能允许替代的社会形式在群体内共存。总的来说,这些结果表明,空间变化的选择可能是维持社会组织遗传多态性的机制之一。