Surgery. 2021 May;169(5):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
After the American Board of Surgery announcement of the Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum requirement in 2014, we implemented a dedicated endoscopy rotation at the post graduate year (PGY)2 level including a simulation curriculum for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery skills. Here we evaluate the outcomes of this implementation.
Beginning in 2015, we developed a clinical endoscopy and simulation-based rotation to prepare for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery testing. Originally, our curriculum was based on the published Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories curriculum using the GI Mentor and transitioned to a mastery learning curriculum using the Endoscopy Training System in 2016. We evaluated the success of the curriculum in terms of first-time pass rates, training time required, and comparison to previously published benchmarks based on clinical experience.
Since 2015, a total of 37 general surgery residents in our program were Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery tested (PGY2 = 24, PGY3 = 4, PGY5 = 9); 84% (31) completed the Endoscopy Training System curriculum. At the time of testing, 73% (27) had performed <25 esophagogastroduodenoscopies, and 46% had performed <25 colonoscopies. Ninety-two percent (34) spent 10 hours or less completing the curriculum. The first-time pass rate for those completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum was 97% vs 67% for those not completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum (P = .01). For residents completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum, total Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery scores were discernibly higher (472 vs 389, P < .01), as were 3/5 task scores (Nav1 80 vs 67, P = .02; Loop2 36 vs 8, P = .02; Retro3 89 vs 71, P = .02). Despite clinical inexperience (<25 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and <50 colonoscopies), PGY2s yielded a mean score of 454 and a pass rate of 92%. This was similar to PGY5s (427, 89%; P = .3) and compares to benchmark data of endoscopists with >300 cases.
Early implementation of flexible endoscopy training with a simulation-based curriculum results in Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance equal to a clinical experience not often gained during surgical residency. Often requiring <10 hours, this represents a fantastic return on investment for this training.
2014 年美国外科学委员会宣布开展内镜课程要求后,我们在住院医师培训 2 年级(PGY2)水平开展了专门的内镜轮转,并为内镜外科基本技能建立了模拟课程。在此,我们评估该实施的结果。
从 2015 年开始,我们开发了一项临床内镜和基于模拟的轮转课程,以准备内镜基本技能测试。最初,我们的课程基于已公布的德克萨斯州外科技能实验室协会课程,使用 GI Mentor,并于 2016 年过渡到使用内镜培训系统的掌握学习课程。我们根据临床经验,从首次通过率、所需培训时间以及与先前公布的基准进行比较的角度评估课程的成功。
自 2015 年以来,我们计划中的 37 名普通外科住院医师接受了内镜基本技能测试(PGY2=24,PGY3=4,PGY5=9);84%(31 人)完成了内镜培训系统课程。在测试时,73%(27 人)进行了<25 例食管胃十二指肠镜检查,46%进行了<25 例结肠镜检查。92%(34 人)花费 10 小时或更少完成课程。完成内镜培训系统课程的首次通过率为 97%,而未完成内镜培训系统课程的首次通过率为 67%(P=0.01)。对于完成内镜培训系统课程的住院医师,内镜基本技能的总分明显更高(472 分比 389 分,P<.01),5 项任务中的 3 项(Nav1 80 分比 67 分,P=0.02;Loop2 36 分比 8 分,P=0.02;Retro3 89 分比 71 分,P=0.02)也更高。尽管临床经验不足(<25 例食管胃十二指肠镜检查和<50 例结肠镜检查),PGY2 的平均得分为 454,通过率为 92%。这与 PGY5(427,89%;P=0.3)相似,与>300 例病例的内镜医师的基准数据相似。
早期实施基于模拟课程的灵活内镜培训,可达到与外科住院医师培训期间通常无法获得的临床经验相当的内镜基本技能表现。通常需要<10 小时,这是对此培训的巨大投资回报。