• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足踝创伤出版物的发表特征:1997年至2017年文章综述

Publication Characteristics of Foot and Ankle Trauma Publications: A Review of Articles From 1997 to 2017.

作者信息

Andrews Nicholas A, Alexander Bradley, Jones James, Agarwal Abhinav, Jardaly Achraf H, McGwin Gerald, Shah Ashish

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jan 10;13(1):e12607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12607.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.12607
PMID:33585097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872493/
Abstract

Background The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare publishing characteristics in foot and ankle trauma articles published in two subspecialty journals and two general orthopedic journals. Methods All trauma articles related to foot and ankle surgery published from five different time intervals over a 20-year period were collected and the following was analyzed: authorship, level of evidence, type of study, citations, and geographic region. Results Foot and Ankle International (FAI) had the highest percentage of last and corresponding authors that were fellowship-trained in foot and ankle. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American and British volumes (JBJS(A) and JBJS(B), respectively) and the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (JOT) articles had a higher percentage of last and corresponding authors that were fellowship-trained in trauma. Conclusion Foot and ankle-trained authors are currently under-represented in foot and ankle trauma literature. As the field of foot and ankle continues to grow, it is important that the experts in the field are well represented in the literature.

摘要

背景 本研究的目的是评估和比较发表在两本专科期刊和两本普通骨科期刊上的足踝创伤文章的发表特征。方法 收集了20年期间五个不同时间间隔内发表的所有与足踝手术相关的创伤文章,并对以下内容进行了分析:作者身份、证据水平、研究类型、引用情况和地理区域。结果 《足踝国际》(FAI)中接受足踝专科培训的最后作者和通讯作者的比例最高。《骨与关节外科杂志》美国卷和英国卷(分别为JBJS(A)和JBJS(B))以及《骨科创伤杂志》(JOT)的文章中,接受创伤专科培训的最后作者和通讯作者的比例更高。结论 在足踝创伤文献中,目前接受足踝专科培训的作者代表性不足。随着足踝领域的不断发展,该领域的专家在文献中有良好的代表性非常重要。

相似文献

1
Publication Characteristics of Foot and Ankle Trauma Publications: A Review of Articles From 1997 to 2017.足踝创伤出版物的发表特征:1997年至2017年文章综述
Cureus. 2021 Jan 10;13(1):e12607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12607.
2
Publishing Characteristics of Foot and Ankle Research Over a 15-Year Time Interval: A Review of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery from 2004 to 2018.15 年时间间隔中足踝研究的发表特征:2004 年至 2018 年《骨科与关节外科杂志》的回顾。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Oct 21;102(20):e117. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00367.
3
Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013-2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals.评估2013 - 2018年骨科文献的证据水平:对主要骨科期刊上3449篇文章的综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 May 16;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00246-6. eCollection 2020.
4
Research Productivity of Foot and Ankle Fellowship Faculty.足踝 fellowship 教员的研究生产力。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2022 Feb;15(1):82-88. doi: 10.1177/1938640020970101. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
5
Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications.足部和踝关节出版物的研究质量和证据水平。
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):1-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0001.
6
Twenty Five-Year Publication Trends in Foot and Ankle Literature: Improved Methodological Quality and Internationality With Time.25 年足踝文献发表趋势:方法学质量和国际化程度随时间改善。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Feb 10;5(2):e20.00154. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00154.
7
Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010?足踝外科文献中的证据水平:2000 年至 2010 年的进展?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 1;94(15):e1121-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01453.
8
Trends in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Publications.足踝矫形外科出版物的趋势
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022 Jun 20;7(2):24730114221108107. doi: 10.1177/24730114221108107. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Gender Trends in Authorship of Foot and Ankle Academic Literature Over 24 Years.24年间足踝学术文献作者的性别趋势
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):898-903. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
A Bibliometric Analysis of 4 Major Foot and Ankle Surgery Journals.四大足踝外科杂志文献计量分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul-Aug;60(4):692-696. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Citation Rate in the Spine Literature.脊柱文献被引频次的预测因素。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):76-81. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000921.
2
A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries.对顶级出版国家近期出版趋势的回顾。
Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 27;7(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1.
3
Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2010 and 2016: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties.2010年至2016年骨科期刊的影响因素:趋势及与其他外科专业的比较
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):114. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.02.
4
Trends in Authorship Characteristics in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994 to 2014.1994年至2014年《美国运动医学杂志》作者特征的趋势
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1857-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546516639955. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Level of evidence trends in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1980-2010.《骨与关节外科杂志》1980 - 2010年证据水平趋势
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:197-203.
6
Publication and level of evidence trends in the American Journal of Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2011.1996年至2011年《美国运动医学杂志》的发表情况及证据水平趋势
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):220-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514528790. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
7
Authorship proliferation in the orthopaedic literature.矫形文献中的作者群体膨胀现象。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 3;95(7):e44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00519.
8
Publication trends in knee surgery: a review of the last 16 years.膝关节手术的发表趋势:对过去 16 年的回顾。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.022. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010?足踝外科文献中的证据水平:2000 年至 2010 年的进展?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 1;94(15):e1121-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01453.
10
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.对发表在普通医学期刊上的文章在科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术中被引用情况的比较。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1092-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1307.