• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数可预测伴有全身炎症反应综合征的肝硬化患者的院内死亡率。

Low Absolute Eosinophil Count Predicts In-Hospital Mortality in Cirrhosis With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.

作者信息

Wilson Varsha, Kantan Velayudhan Kunnothara, Rao Harshavardhan, Velickakathu Sukumaran Sheejamol

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kochi, IND.

Gastroenterology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kochi, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jan 11;13(1):e12643. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12643.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.12643
PMID:33585129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872885/
Abstract

Introduction Chronic liver disease (CLD) or Cirrhosis is one of the most common causes of morbidity as well as mortality. Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) are useful to assess the long-term prognosis of a patient with CLD. When a patient with CLD is admitted with an acute illness leading to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), these scores may not be reliable to predict the short-term prognosis and survival. Absolute eosinophils count (AEC) allows the rapid identification of patients at increased risk for sepsis-related mortality in patients. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted among patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India during a period of one and a half years between October 2018 and April 2020. Cirrhotic patients with SIRS aged between 16 years and 80 years were included in the study. AEC was measured as a part of automated complete blood counts. Patient demographics, lab parameters, and outcomes in terms of mortality were studied. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD/median and categorical variables were expressed in frequency. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to find an ideal cutoff for AEC in predicting hospital mortality. Multi-variate Cox regression analysis was performed to find predictors of mortality. Results A total of 100 patients who fit the pre-determined criteria for cirrhosis with SIRS were enrolled in the study. Sixteen (16%) patients died at the end of the study while 84 (84%) were alive. Using a ROC curve, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.716 with 95% CI of AUC (0.564-0.867), the p-value was found to 0.006, a cut-off of eosinophil count of 198.5 cells/uL was found to be the cut-off for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in this subset of patients with cirrhosis and sepsis with SIRS, with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 38.1%. In a multi-variate Cox regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio {HR}: 1.175, 95%CI, 1.084 to 1.275, p<0.001) , CRP (HR : 1.008, 95%CI, 1.00 to 1.015, p=0.042) values, total leukocyte counts (TLC) (HR: 1.226, 95%CI, 1.116 to 1.346, p<0.001) and AEC (HR: 0.993, 95%CI, 0.987 to 0.999, p=0.016) were found to be statistically significant independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions The presence of eosinopenia may be considered as an in-expensive warning biomarker for poorer clinical outcomes in the form of in-hospital mortality in hospitalized cirrhotic patients. Other biomarkers such as CRP and TLC could also play a role both independently and in conjunction with AEC to predict outcomes and mortality in cirrhotic patients with sepsis and SIRS.

摘要

引言 慢性肝病(CLD)或肝硬化是发病和死亡的最常见原因之一。Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)有助于评估CLD患者的长期预后。当CLD患者因急性疾病入院导致全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)时,这些评分可能无法可靠地预测短期预后和生存率。绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数(AEC)有助于快速识别脓毒症相关死亡风险增加的患者。方法 这是一项横断面研究,于2018年10月至2020年4月在印度南部一家三级护理医院的患者中进行,为期一年半。纳入年龄在16岁至80岁之间患有SIRS的肝硬化患者。AEC作为自动全血细胞计数的一部分进行测量。研究了患者的人口统计学、实验室参数以及死亡率方面的结局。连续变量以均值±标准差/中位数表示,分类变量以频率表示。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定AEC预测医院死亡率的理想临界值。进行多变量Cox回归分析以寻找死亡率的预测因素。结果 共有100例符合肝硬化合并SIRS预定标准的患者纳入研究。16例(16%)患者在研究结束时死亡,84例(84%)存活。使用ROC曲线,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.716,AUC的95%置信区间为(0.564 - 0.867),p值为0.006,发现嗜酸性粒细胞计数198.5个/微升为该组肝硬化合并脓毒症及SIRS患者住院死亡率预测的临界值,敏感性为75%,特异性为38.1%。在多变量Cox回归分析中,仅年龄(风险比{HR}:1.175,95%置信区间,1.084至1.275,p<0.001)、CRP(HR:1.008,95%置信区间,1.00至1.015,p = 0.042)值、总白细胞计数(TLC)(HR:1.226,95%置信区间,1.116至1.346,p<0.001)和AEC(HR:0.993,95%置信区间,0.987至0.999,p = 0.016)被发现是死亡率的统计学显著独立预测因素。结论 嗜酸性粒细胞减少的存在可被视为住院肝硬化患者院内死亡这一较差临床结局的廉价警示生物标志物。其他生物标志物如CRP和TLC也可单独或与AEC共同发挥作用,以预测肝硬化合并脓毒症及SIRS患者的结局和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6771/7872885/a227c4097859/cureus-0013-00000012643-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6771/7872885/a227c4097859/cureus-0013-00000012643-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6771/7872885/a227c4097859/cureus-0013-00000012643-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Low Absolute Eosinophil Count Predicts In-Hospital Mortality in Cirrhosis With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.低绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数可预测伴有全身炎症反应综合征的肝硬化患者的院内死亡率。
Cureus. 2021 Jan 11;13(1):e12643. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12643.
2
Low eosinophil count predicts in-hospital mortality in cirrhosis with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.低嗜酸性粒细胞计数可预测伴有全身炎症反应综合征的肝硬化患者的住院死亡率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jun;25(6):676-82. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835eb8f7.
3
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and model for end-stage liver disease score accurately predict the in-hospital mortality of black African patients with decompensated cirrhosis at initial hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.全身炎症反应综合征和终末期肝病模型评分可准确预测非洲黑人失代偿期肝硬化患者初次住院时的院内死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 9;11:143-152. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S140655. eCollection 2018.
4
Predicting Mortality Across a Broad Spectrum of Liver Disease-An Assessment of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Creatinine-Modified CTP Scores.预测广泛肝病患者的死亡率——对终末期肝病模型(MELD)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分以及肌酐修正CTP评分的评估
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011 Dec;1(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60233-8. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
5
Exploration of eosinopenia as a diagnostic parameter to differentiate sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome: Results from an observational study.探索嗜酸性粒细胞减少作为区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征的诊断参数:一项观察性研究的结果
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 May;20(5):285-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.182199.
6
Cryptococcosis in patients with liver cirrhosis: Death risk factors and predictive value of prognostic models.肝硬化患者的隐球菌病:死亡风险因素和预后模型的预测价值。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Oct;20(5):460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
[A new score system for prediction of death in patients with severe trauma: the value of death warning score].[一种用于预测严重创伤患者死亡的新评分系统:死亡预警评分的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):890-4.
8
C-reactive protein predicts short-term mortality in patients with cirrhosis.C 反应蛋白可预测肝硬化患者的短期死亡率。
J Hepatol. 2012 Jun;56(6):1299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.030. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
9
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.评分系统对疑似感染肝硬化患者预后预测价值的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421.
10
The Combined SIRS + qSOFA (qSIRS) Score is More Accurate Than qSOFA Alone in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Surgical Sepsis in an LMIC Emergency Department.联合 SIRS + qSOFA(qSIRS)评分比单独 qSOFA 更能准确预测中低收入国家急诊外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05181-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Absolute Eosinophil Counts as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis.绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为脓毒症患者的预后标志物
Ann Afr Med. 2025 Apr 1;24(2):332-336. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_203_24. Epub 2025 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Serum albumin as a risk factor for death in patients with prolonged sepsis: An observational study.血清白蛋白作为延长脓毒症患者死亡的风险因素:一项观察性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Serum Albumin Trend Is a Predictor of Mortality in ICU Patients With Sepsis.血清白蛋白趋势是脓毒症重症监护病房患者死亡率的一个预测指标。
Biol Res Nurs. 2019 May;21(3):237-244. doi: 10.1177/1099800419827600. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
3
Better prognostic marker in ICU - APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II!重症监护病房中更好的预后标志物——急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)还是简化急性生理学评分II(SAP II)!
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Sep-Oct;32(5):1146-1151. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10080.
4
Low eosinophil count predicts in-hospital mortality in cirrhosis with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.低嗜酸性粒细胞计数可预测伴有全身炎症反应综合征的肝硬化患者的住院死亡率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jun;25(6):676-82. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835eb8f7.
5
C-reactive protein as a predictor of mortality in patients affected with severe sepsis in intensive care unit.C反应蛋白作为重症监护病房中严重脓毒症患者死亡率的预测指标。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012 Nov 21;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-7-47.
6
Relationship between Age and Peripheral White Blood Cell Count in Patients with Sepsis.脓毒症患者年龄与外周血白细胞计数的关系
Int J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;2(4):238-42.
7
Eosinopenia as a diagnostic marker of bloodstream infection in hospitalised paediatric and adult patients: a case-control study.嗜酸性粒细胞减少作为住院儿童和成人血流感染的诊断标志物:一项病例对照研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Mar;39(2):224-30. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900211.
8
Eosinopenia: Is it a good marker of sepsis in comparison to procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels for patients admitted to a critical care unit in an urban hospital?嗜酸性粒细胞减少症:与降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白水平相比,它是否是入住城市医院重症监护病房患者脓毒症的一个较好标志物?
J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.002.
9
A comparison of eosinopenia and C-reactive protein as a marker of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a case control study.危重症患者中嗜酸性粒细胞减少症与C反应蛋白作为血流感染标志物的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):450-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700319.
10
Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infection in elderly critically ill patients: a comparison between middle-aged, old, and very old patients.老年危重症患者医院血流感染的流行病学及转归:中年、老年和高龄患者的比较
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1634-41. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819da98e.