Perelman School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
The Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):590-597. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9142.
Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) operate under limited financial resources and have had challenges providing high-quality care. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act led to improvements in hospital finances, but whether this was associated with better hospital quality, particularly among SNHs given their baseline financial constraints, remains unknown.
To compare changes in quality from 2012 to 2018 between SNHs in states that expanded Medicaid vs those in states that did not.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a difference-in-differences analysis in a cohort study, performance on quality measures was compared between SNHs, defined as those in the highest quartile of uncompensated care in the pre-Medicaid expansion period, in expansion vs nonexpansion states, before and after the implementation of Medicaid expansion. A total of 811 SNHs were included in the analysis, with 316 in nonexpansion states and 495 in expansion states. The study was conducted from January to November 2020.
Time-varying indicators for Medicaid expansion status.
The primary outcome was hospital quality measured by patient-reported experience (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey), health care-associated infections (central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and surgical site infections following colon surgery) and patient outcomes (30-day mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia). Secondary outcomes included hospital financial measures (uncompensated care and operating margins), adoption of electronic health records, provision of safety-net services (enabling, linguistic/translation, and transportation services), or safety-net service lines (trauma, burn, obstetrics, neonatal intensive, and psychiatric care).
In this difference-in-differences analysis of a cohort of 811 SNHs, no differential changes in patient-reported experience, health care-associated infections, readmissions, or mortality were noted, regardless of Medicaid expansion status after the Affordable Care Act. There were modest differential increases between 2012 and 2016 in the adoption of electronic health records (mean [SD]: nonexpansion states, 99.4 [7.4] vs 99.9 [3.8]; expansion states, 94.6 [22.6] vs 100.0 [2.2]; 1.7 percentage points; P = .02) and between 2012 and 2018 in the number of inpatient psychiatric beds (mean [SD]: nonexpansion states, 24.7 [36.0] vs 23.6 [39.0]; expansion states: 29.3 [42.8] vs 31.4 [44.3]; 1.4 beds; P = .02) among SNHs in expansion states, although they were not statistically significant at a threshold adjusted for multiple comparisons. In subgroup analyses comparing SNHs with higher vs lower baseline operating margins, an isolated differential improvement was noted in heart failure readmissions among SNHs with lower baseline operating margins in expansion states (mean [SD], 22.8 [2.1]; -0.53 percentage points; P = .001).
This difference-in-differences cohort study found that despite reductions in uncompensated care and improvements in operating margins, there appears to be little evidence of quality improvement among SNHs in states that expanded Medicaid compared with those in states that did not.
安全网医院(SNH)在有限的财务资源下运营,并在提供高质量护理方面面临挑战。平价医疗法案下的医疗补助扩张导致医院财务状况有所改善,但这是否与更好的医院质量有关,特别是考虑到 SNH 处于基线财务限制,这一点仍不清楚。
比较 2012 年至 2018 年期间,在实施医疗补助扩张的州和未实施的州,SNH 的质量变化。
设计、地点和参与者: 使用队列研究中的差异中的差异分析,比较了 SNH(定义为在医疗补助扩张前时期未补偿护理最高四分位数的医院)在扩张和非扩张州之间的质量衡量标准,在医疗补助扩张实施前后。共有 811 家 SNH 参与了分析,其中 316 家在非扩张州,495 家在扩张州。该研究于 2020 年 1 月至 11 月进行。
医疗补助扩张状况的时间变化指标。
主要结果是通过患者报告的体验(医疗保健提供者和系统调查的医院消费者评估)、医疗保健相关感染(中心静脉相关血流感染、导管相关尿路感染和结肠手术后手术部位感染)和患者结果(急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎的 30 天死亡率和再入院率)衡量的医院质量。次要结果包括医院财务措施(未补偿护理和运营利润率)、电子病历的采用、安全网服务的提供(赋能、语言/翻译和交通服务)或安全网服务线(创伤、烧伤、产科、新生儿重症监护和精神科护理)。
在这项关于 811 家 SNH 的队列的差异中的差异分析中,无论医疗补助法案实施后是否实施了平价医疗法案,都没有注意到患者报告的体验、医疗保健相关感染、再入院或死亡率的差异变化。在电子病历的采用方面,2012 年至 2016 年之间略有差异增加(平均值[标准差]:非扩张州为 99.4[7.4]与 99.9[3.8];扩张州为 94.6[22.6]与 100.0[2.2];1.7 个百分点;P=0.02),在 2012 年至 2018 年之间,住院精神科床位数量也略有增加(平均值[标准差]:非扩张州为 24.7[36.0]与 23.6[39.0];扩张州为 29.3[42.8]与 31.4[44.3];1.4 个床位;P=0.02),这在扩张州的 SNH 中是明显的,尽管在经过多次比较调整的阈值下,这些差异并不具有统计学意义。在对基线运营利润率较高与较低的 SNH 进行的亚组分析中,在扩张州中,基线运营利润率较低的心力衰竭再入院率有所改善(平均值[标准差],22.8[2.1];-0.53 个百分点;P=0.001)。
这项差异中的差异队列研究发现,尽管未补偿护理减少,运营利润率提高,但在实施医疗补助扩张的州中,SNH 的质量改善似乎证据很少,而在未实施的州则没有。