Suppr超能文献

基于现有“真实世界”证据的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者管理中直接非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的成本效益比较:意大利国家卫生系统视角。

Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available "Real-World" Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective.

机构信息

Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Mar;41(3):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF.

METHODS

A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice.

摘要

背景与目的

越来越多的真实世界证据(RWE)表明,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)在心房颤动(AF)管理中的安全性和有效性,为更好地了解 DOAC 与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)的临床和经济意义提供了机会。本研究的目的是使用 AF 患者的真实世界证据数据,比较 DOAC 与 VKA 的经济意义。

方法

使用马尔可夫模型模拟诊断为非瓣膜性 AF 患者的终生病程,从意大利国家卫生系统(INHS)的角度评估 DOAC(即利伐沙班、达比加群和阿哌沙班)与 VKA 的成本效益。该模型由文献和 RWE 中关于中风/系统性栓塞(SE)、大出血(MB)、颅内出血(ICH)和全因死亡率(ACM)发生率的荟萃分析数据组成;直接成本包括药物成本、药物监测成本以及官方国家清单中事件管理成本。采用单因素和概率敏感性分析(PSA)来评估结果的稳健性。

结果

荟萃分析结果表明,阿哌沙班在中风/SE、MB 和 ACM 方面具有较高的有效性概率。尽管 DOAC 的购置成本较高,但成本效益分析显示,与 VKA 相比,所有 DOAC 均具有成本效益,每位患者的节省金额在 4647 欧元(利伐沙班)至 6086 欧元(阿哌沙班)之间。此外,所有 DOAC 都在质量调整生命年和生命年方面都有获益。根据 PSA,阿哌沙班的结果是一致的,而对于达比加群和利伐沙班,PSA 则显示出更高的不确定性。

结论

RWE 中 DOAC 在控制事件方面的有益效果有可能抵消药物相关成本,从而提高非瓣膜性 AF 日常临床实践中治疗的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d7/7946694/66f92f272e32/40261_2021_1002_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验