Suppr超能文献

学术团体协作向开放获取出版过渡。

Collaborative transition to open access publishing by scholarly societies.

机构信息

Open Science & Open Access Strategist, CERN, Espl. des Particules 1, 1211 Meyrin, Switzerland.

Associate University Librarian, Iowa State University, 701 Morrill Rd. Ames, IA 50011.

出版信息

Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Feb 15;32(4):311-313. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-03-0178.

Abstract

For decades, universities, researchers, and libraries have sought a systemwide transition of scholarly publishing to open access (OA), but progress has been slow. There is now a potential for more rapid and impactful change, as new collaborative OA publishing models have taken shape. Cooperative publishing arrangements represent a viable path forward for society publishers to transition to OA as the default standard for disseminating research. The traditional article processing charge OA model has introduced sometimes unnavigable financial roadblocks, but cooperative arrangements premised on collective action principles can help to secure long-term stability and prevent the risk of free riding. Investment in cooperative arrangements does not require that cash-strapped libraries discover a new influx of money as their collection budgets continue to shrink, but rather that they purposefully redirect traditional subscription funds toward publishing support. These cooperative arrangements will require a two-way demonstration of trust: On one hand, libraries working together to provide assurances of sustained financial support, and on the other, societies' willingness to experiment with discarding subscriptions. Organizations such as Society Publishers Coalition and Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access are committed to education about and further development of scalable and cooperative OA publishing models.

摘要

几十年来,大学、研究人员和图书馆一直在寻求将学术出版全面转向开放获取(OA),但进展缓慢。随着新的合作式开放获取出版模式的形成,现在有可能实现更快、更具影响力的变革。合作出版安排代表了一种可行的前进道路,使社会出版商能够过渡到 OA,将其作为传播研究的默认标准。传统的文章处理费 OA 模式引入了有时难以逾越的财务障碍,但基于集体行动原则的合作安排有助于确保长期稳定,并防止搭便车的风险。对合作安排的投资并不要求资金紧张的图书馆在其馆藏预算继续缩减的情况下发现新的资金流入,而是要求它们有目的地将传统订阅资金重新用于出版支持。这些合作安排将需要建立双向信任:一方面,图书馆共同努力提供持续的财务支持保证,另一方面,学会愿意尝试放弃订阅。像 Society Publishers Coalition 和 Transitioning Society Publications to Open Access 这样的组织致力于对可扩展和合作式开放获取出版模式进行教育和进一步发展。

相似文献

2
Institutional open access funds: now is the time.机构开放获取基金:现在是时候了。
PLoS Biol. 2010 May 25;8(5):e1000375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000375.
6
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9

本文引用的文献

2
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.数字时代学术出版商的寡头垄断
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验